When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  USA  Society  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
The U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Healy was anchored off the coast of Nome, Alaska on Thursday, December 1. Photo: Denise Michels. Courtesy Alaska Dispatch.
The U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Healy was anchored off the coast of Nome, Alaska on Thursday, December 1. Photo: Denise Michels. Courtesy Alaska Dispatch.
About the time U.S. Senator Mark Begich was writing a letter to the Coast Guard pleading for ice-breaking help to get 1.6 million gallons of fuel to Nome, residents in that Northwest Alaska community of 3,600 were looking out the window at, lo and behold, the Coast Guard's only functioning icebreaker.

Was it coincidence?

The 420-foot medium-duty ice-breaker apparently anchored a mile off Nome's coast unexpectedly and a helicopter delivered an ailing crewmember to Nome, said Nome Mayor Denise Michels.

"It's a total fluke," laughed Michels. "It's ironic." Residents saw the ship's lights this morning as it anchored up about a mile off the port during the surprise stop before it heads to its winter port in Washington state.

The Coast Guard said the Healy had been conducting research in the Barrow region near Alaska's northernmost community before heading south toward Nome. The ship switched out a crewmember using a commercial helicopter, said Kip Wadlow, a Chief Petty Officer and Coast Guard spokesman in Juneau.

Now, it plans to spend the next two weeks in the Nome area, conducting scientific research, Wadlow said.

Port inaccessible

Nome's ice-clogged port is shut down. Partly because of that, a Delta Western tug and barge hauling the big load of fuel last week failed to reach the remote Inupiat community.

Nome is unconnected by road to the outside world, so fuel is usually barged in. Residents worry unleaded gas prices this spring will soar from a pump price of about $5.40 if the canceled delivery means costly emergency shipments of fuel must be flown in later this winter.

The canceled delivery had Delta Western and others searching for an ice breaker before one suddenly arrived on Nome's doorstep.

Thursday morning, after news of the boat's arrival spread, Michels called Coast Guard headquarters in Juneau. First, she offered up some hospitality: Would the crews like a tour of the Gold Rush-era town?

"We also offered them vehicles to get things done," she said.

Then she got to more serious matters. Since the city needs that fuel, "if there is a way, could the Coast Guard possibly break the ice to escort the fuel barge in?"

Plans to break through the ice evaluated

The turned-back barge is now in Kachemak Bay, hundreds of miles and two weeks from Nome. Still, the Coast Guard is working with Delta Western, the city and the company that ordered the fuel, Bonanza Fuel, to see what it would take to break through the ice, said the Coast Guard's Wadlow.

The Healy draft is too deep to negotiate Nome's shallow harbor. It's far away, but still visible from town, Michels said. One prospect is that the Healy could break the ice a mile of the way to dockside, and a second vessel, perhaps an ice-capable tug, could punch the rest of the way through to give the barge an opening, Michels said.

Delta Western is also wrestling with questions, but it's ready to help, said Kirk Payne, the petroleum distribution company's vice president. Is it safe to send its crews to Nome? What are the environmental risks? How thick is the ice and what kind of equipment would be needed to get the fuel to the dock?

Cook Inlet Tug and Barge operates ice-capable tugs in Cook Inlet, said Payne. "The question is, are they available? That's what we're trying to ascertain. And will they work for what we're trying to do?"

Nome's crisis raised the ire of Alaska's senators, both of whom on Thursday dashed off letters to the Coast Guard seeking a solution.

"While I am sure the officers and crew of the CGC Healy are anxious to return home to Seattle, I ask that you use the Healy and other assets available to assist the people of western Alaska with any fuel or supply shortages they face, if possible," Murkowski said in her letter to Adm. Robert Papp Jr., Coast Guard commandant.

Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska, said in his letter to the admiral:

"This pending fuel shortage in rural Alaska highlights the lack of Coast Guard icebreaking capability in the state," Alaska's junior U.S. senator said. "Elsewhere in our nation, the Coast Guard frequently operates icebreakers and icebreaking tugs to keep waterways open and to allow for delivery of fuel and other critical commodities."

But apparently not in Alaska, he noted. Last January, the Coast Guard broke through ice in Chesapeake Bay to keep fuel shipments flowing in Maryland. Similar help would be useful in Nome, Begich noted.

Begich notes that an executive order calls for the Coast Guard to keep navigation moving nationwide to benefit commerce, and that the Coast Guard's own rules say it will provide icebreaking services to communities in immediate need of heating fuel as well as medical assistance and food.

The community doesn't face an immediate crisis, Nome mayor Michels said. And while heating fuel was one of three fuels being transported by the barge, it's the gasoline that may be in shortest supply as winter drags on. Begich said he wrote the letter to highlight this latest example of the country's icebreaking limitations.

Comments  

 
#1 Doubtful NSF Will CooperateArcticman 2011-12-03 22:43
The USCGC Healy is used by the National Science Foundation (NSF) to conduct Arctic research, and as it has been related to me by Coast Guard officers in the know, the NSF does not want the Healy conducting the types of missions the Nome community is asking it to conduct. Seriously? Is scientific exploration more important than taking care of the basic needs of American citizens? It's within the Coast Guard's mission profile, so why not help? My guess, the USCGC Healy will steam away and not help. Why? Because the NSF pays the preponderance of the Healy's operating costs and has the majority share invested. Hopefully, Senator Begich will be successful, but I have my doubts.
Quote