When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  USA  Environment  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
The outflow of Mendenhall Glacier exports energy rich carbon to the Gulf of Alaska. Photo by Aron Stubbins, Skidaway Institute of Oceanography. Alaska Dispatch.
The outflow of Mendenhall Glacier exports energy rich carbon to the Gulf of Alaska. Photo by Aron Stubbins, Skidaway Institute of Oceanography. Alaska Dispatch.
Organic grit from human activities -- preserved by glaciers for centuries and now flushing into the ocean in a colossal regional meltdown -- may be fueling the marine food web of the Gulf of Alaska and other coastal ecosystems in unprecedented ways, according to a new study published online this week by Nature Geoscience.

A team of scientists found that the major source of the carbon spewing off Alaska's glaciers into the sea isn't ancient peat or long-buried forests, as once assumed.

Rather, it's the dissolved fall-out from the burning of fossil fuel by people from across the globe over many centuries.

"Remote regions are often perceived as being pristine and devoid of human influence," said lead scientist Aron Stubbins from the Skidaway Institute of Oceanography in Georgia, in this story about the research. "Glaciers show us that nowhere goes untouched by industry. Instead, burning fuels has an impact upon the natural functioning of ecosystems far removed from industrial activity."

The study, which married ice-stomping field science to molecular spectrometry, may challenge assumptions about what factors truly influence Alaska's rich marine ecology and bolster the health of its multibillion-dollar fisheries.

With glacier melt accelerating due to climate warming, and most tidewater glaciers locked into a retreating phase, the amount of dissolved organic material that's flushing into coastal waters has soared in recent decades.

As a result, the microbes and plankton at the bottom of the food web in marine ecosystems like the Gulf of Alaska have basically been guests at an extraordinary banquet of organic nutrients. It means, the scientists said, that this vast dump of glacial carbon into coastal waters is a development of modern times.

Which raises a jarring question. Is Alaska's marine environment so productive because it's fertilized by human-generated soot, or because it's a pure enclave in a polluted world?

"When we look at the marine food webs today, we may be seeing a picture that is significantly different from what existed before the late-18th century," Stubbins said in a different story posted by the National Science Foundation. "It is unknown how this manmade carbon has influenced the coastal food webs of Alaska and the fisheries they support."

Sampling glaciers for soot secrets

The paper -- "Anthropogenic aerosols as a source of ancient dissolved organic matter in glaciers" -- arose from a NSF-sponsored project that examined glaciers and their runoff in Alaska and other locales. The bulk of the samples came from Mendenhall Glacier near Juneau. The study's 13 co-authors represent institutions in eight states, and include Eran Hood and Andrew Vermilyea from the University of Alaska Southeast.

Dissolved organic matter flushing out of glaciers has long been recognized as a major source of "ancient, yet highly bio-available carbon to downstream ecosystems" like rivers, estuaries and the ocean, the scientists explained in the paper.

The stuff enriches every drop of glacial outflow with nutrients, and all of it ultimately gets consumed by microorganisms and other tiny critters at the bottom of the aquatic food chain.

But where does all that digestible carbon come from?

"The remnants of ancient peatlands and forests overrun by glaciers have been invoked as the source of this organic matter," the scientists wrote. "Here, we examine the radiocarbon age and chemical composition of dissolved organic matter in snow, glacier surface water, ice and glacier outflow samples from Alaska to determine the origin."

In 2009 and 2010, the scientists visited the Mendenall Glacier to take 11 samples. They also sampled Herbert Glacier outflow, about five miles north of Mendenhall Glacier, and Peterson Creek, which isn't fed by glaciers.

"The Gulf of Alaska (GOA) drainage basin contains more than (29,000 square miles) or (about 10 percent) of the mountain glaciers on Earth and the annual runoff from this region represents the second largest discharge of freshwater to the Pacific Ocean," they explained in a supplemental article about their methods. "Rates of volume loss from glaciers in this region are among the highest measured on earth and have increased substantially in the last decade."

While the water in the creek was laced with bits and gunk from the surrounding rain forest, the glacial sources yielded organic material that didn't come from any Alaskan landscape.

For one thing, the glacial samples were depleted of the radioactive carbon that would be present in higher concentrations if it were full of the plant litter and peat ground into oblivion by the glacier, the scientists said.

Instead, the material contained gobs of protein-like compounds that originated in microbes or airborne dust known as aerosols, discovered using a process called fluorescence spectrophotometry. They also analyzed the stuff with ultrahigh-resolution mass spectrometry and made another find — combustion products that come from the burning of fossil fuels and forests.

"Based on the presence of these compounds, we suggest that aerosols derived from fossil fuel burning are a source of pre-aged organic matter to glacier surfaces," they concluded. "Furthermore, we show that the molecular signature of the organic matter is conserved in snow, glacier water and outflow, suggesting that the anthropogenic carbon is exported relatively unchanged in glacier outflows."

No place untouched by humans

Among other insights, the results demonstrate that human activities influence the ecology of every place on Earth, including the nutrient content and organic material buried in the Juneau Icefield.

"We are finding this human derived signature in a corner of the U.S. that is traditionally viewed as being exceptionally pristine," said co-author Robert Spencer, of the Woods Hole Research Center, in a story about the research. "The burning of biomass and fossil fuels has an impact we can witness in these glacier systems although they are distant from industrial centers, and it highlights that the surface biogeochemical cycles of today are universally post-industrial in a way we do not fully appreciate."

Any black soot or aerosol dust that falls on the glacier in rain or snow gets locked up inside the ice and preserved, the scientists said. It travels with the glacier until it melts out, perhaps centuries later, and then feeds into the environment with its organic contents undegraded. In contrast, the same organic material falling on forest or grassland would be quickly consumed.

"In frigid glacier environments any input stands out, making glaciers ideal sentinel ecosystems," Spencer said.

As the climate warms, the disintegration of Alaska's coastal glaciers may accelerate and deliver ever more dissolved organic material into the ocean off Alaska's coast. Waters off Greenland and Patagonia, with their own big meltdowns underway, will see similar increases.

How will Alaska marine life fare as this process goes on?

"It's not known to what extent organic material deposition has changed, and will continue to alter, glacially-dominated coastal ecosystems," Stubbins said here.

Contact Doug O'Harra at doug(at)alaskadispatch.com

For more stories from Alaska Dispatch, click here.