When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  USA  Environment  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Photo: Mike Bedell. The Canadian Press.
Photo: Mike Bedell. The Canadian Press.
Amid concerns federal subsistence hunters are shooting up the Nelchina caribou herd along the Alaska and Taylor highways, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game closed the last of its hunts Tuesday.

Division of Wildlife area biologist Rebecca Schwanke in Glennallen reported that to date drawing permit hunters, various types of state subsistence hunters, and federal subsistence hunters have reported killing 2,363 Nelchina caribou. The quota for the year is 2,400. She expects it will be exceeded.

The Nelchina herd, which roams the foothills of Alaska Range north, east and west of Glennallen, numbers about 40,000 animals. Because it is one of the few road accessible herds in the state, and because it is close to the state's population center, focused around Anchorage only 150 miles to the southeast, it has been the most fought-over caribou herd in the state.

Hunting has for years been limited to federal subsistence hunters, who need only claim residence in one of several roadside communities in the area to hunt, and state-recognized subsistence hunters in various forms. The old system generally limited permits to local residents who lived in the area or Alaskans who claimed 20 or more years of hunting experience or a family history of such hunting experience in the area.

Subsistence is an ill-defined term in Alaska when it comes to hunting and fishing. Though generally thought of as a definition of people struggling to survive while living off the land, the term has been categorically defined to eliminate "need'' as a requirement to qualify in the 49th state. To do so, various interest groups have argued, would deny hunting opportunities to people with a cultural connection to the land.

Who gets permits?

Problems have arisen because guaranteeing various minorities -- including old, well-to-do white Alaskans such as the parents of former Gov. Sarah Palin -- the opportunity to hunt has sometimes ended up denying the majority the opportunity to hunt. The old state subsistence permit system so favored longtime Alaskans, and was so widely abused by people fudging their connections to historical Nelchina hunting, that the regulations were amended to now award subsistence permits only to hunters who agreed to limit their caribou hunting to the Nelchina basin, and to hunters from specified communities that qualified for community permits.

The "community permit" issue was itself highly contentious, but in the bigger scheme of things, it turns out to have amounted to little. The community permit hunt was the last to be closed this year. It will end at sundown Tuesday, and Schwanke reported only 83 caribou have so far been reported killed by hunters with community permits.

The bulk of the animals -- 1,708 bulls and 653 cows at last report -- were killed by people claiming state Tier I subsistence permits. Those were the people who basically agreed to limit their hunting for the year to the Nelchina Basin.

Schwanke reported another 365 caribou killed on federal permits, although that hunt continues, and with the caribou now close to the highway system, many animals are expected to be shot. The federal subsistence hunt focuses heavily along roads, often taking place in Alaska highway corridors.

The last bunch of Nelchina caribou reported killed, Schwanke said, were bulls taken in connection with a state drawing permit hunt. There were were 311 such caribou shot. The drawing-permit hunt was added by the state Board of Game to ensure that all Alaskans at least get a chance to a chance to hunt Nelchina caribou. The drawing is open to any hunter who pays a small fee to enter a lottery for a permit.

What system will be in place for handing out Nelchina permits next year is unknown. Regulations for the hunt are almost annually challenged in court, and the state Board of Game, a citizens group that advises Fish and Game on management, regularly rewrites the rules for the hunt to try to satisfy public demands for a fairer system.