When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  USA  Environment  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Ice chunks float in the Arctic Ocean as the sun sets near Barrow, Alaska in September. Photo: Beth Ipsen, Arctic Sounder, AP Photo.
Ice chunks float in the Arctic Ocean as the sun sets near Barrow, Alaska in September. Photo: Beth Ipsen, Arctic Sounder, AP Photo.
After shrinking to one of the smallest summer extents of the past 30 years, the ice cap over the Arctic Ocean has been re-growing quickly as the dark polar winter tightens its grip.

During November, plunging temperatures refroze an average of more than 30,000 square miles of ocean every day — growing enough pans and floes to cover an area almost the size of South Carolina every 24 hours.

That's faster growth than usual, according to records going back to the 1970s.

And yet, despite weather patterns that plunged the ocean off Alaska's north coast into frigid conditions, the Arctic ice cap remained trapped close to record lows for the time of year, according to the latest sea ice analysis posted by the National Sea & Ice Data Center. Only 2006 and 2010 had a smaller area of sea ice this time of year, the NSIDC said here.

By Nov. 30, the ice cap covered some 4.19 million square miles — about 241,000 square miles above the minimum record for that date set in 2006, but hundreds of thousands of square miles below the long-term average. Overall, November sea ice has been declining about 4.7 percent per year, compared to the 1979-to-2000 average, the NSIDC explained. That's a loss of about 20,500 square miles of frozen habitat each year.

"At the end of November, ice extent remained below the 1979 to 2000 average in the Chukchi, Barents and Kara seas, and Hudson Bay was still nearly ice free," the NSIDC explained. "Ice extent was near average in the East Greenland and the Bering seas. These ice conditions may be connected to a strong positive phase of the Arctic Oscillation, which began during the last week of November."

The long goodbye to ice

Overall sea ice has been declining for a generation, with September of 2011 setting a new record for the smallest seasonal extent ever documented during the 30-year age of satellites.

Observational data from various sources extends the trend further back in time. But a new study released only last month found the declines of recent decades to be unprecedented since about Year 561.

"Although extensive uncertainties remain, especially before the 16th century — both the duration and magnitude of the current decline in sea ice seem to be unprecedented for the past 1,450 years," wrote Christophe Kinnard, a geographer with the Center for Advanced Studies in Chile along with five co-authors from Canada, Norway and Ohio, in a research letter to Nature.

The existence of an ice cap atop the Arctic Ocean plays a critical role in stabilizing the world's climate, and its loss during summer contributes to climate change because darker open water absorbs more solar energy than reflective white floes. The exposed ocean then stores heat that in turn and causes even swifter melt and later fall ice formation.

Summer sea ice also provides habitat used by polar bears, walruses and seals. Without ice for hunting and denning, marine mammals find it much harder to find enough to eat or avoid predators. The United States has listed the polar bear as threatened under the Endangered Species Act due to the shrinking ice pack north of Alaska.

Of storms and chills

One factor that paradoxically helped ice return north of Alaska was a bit of unusual weather.

A massive storm swept in from the North Pacific across the Bering Sea last month, when it slammed Alaska's Northwest Coast with hurricane-force winds and some flooding. As the intense low pressure system drifted north, the counter-clockwise circulation may have contributed to the lower-than-average temperatures now seen in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas, according to the NSIDC analysis.

The NSIDC called it the strongest November storm to hit northwest Alaska since 1974.

Winds that rose past 80 mph in some locations would have made the storm equivalent to a Category 1 hurricane, with a storm surge comparable to a Category 3 storm, a National Weather Service forecaster told NSIDC's Katherine Leitze in a story titled "An Arctic Hurricane?"

"The storm was unusual because it occurred so early in the winter, before sea ice had formed into a thick covering that can dampen waves," Leitze wrote. "Some media coverage of the storm suggested that less sea ice covering the ocean left the coastal areas more vulnerable to the storm than they would have been otherwise. But in the region where the storm hit ... sea ice extent was actually pretty close to average for that time of year."