When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  USA  Geopolitics  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Illustration: Aaron Jansen. Alaska Dispatch.
Illustration: Aaron Jansen. Alaska Dispatch.
As countries eye a vast array of untapped resources in the melting Arctic, an Alaska legislative task force wants the federal government to invest in new ice-breaking ships and the region's first U.S. Coast Guard base.

Those are just some of the recommendations issued by the Alaska Northern Waters Task Force in a final report meant to help the state and U.S. "stake our ground," as one member put it, in the international race to carve up resources in the once ice-locked region.

The Legislature created the panel in 2010 to dial it into changes happening in the Arctic.

Alaska's Arctic woefully unprepared

One big change includes a sharp rise in the number of ships plying Alaskan coastal waters, especially through the Bering Strait. Cruise-ship tourism has grown, energy companies are studying underwater deposits, and Russian and European shippers are seeking a fast route to Far East markets.

Alaska's Arctic is woefully unprepared for the extra visitors. The nearest U.S. Coast Guard base and rescue planes are hundreds of miles away. International ships traveling near Alaska aren't required to report their presence to U.S. officials. Meantime, the region lacks sophisticated ship-tracking tools and designated lanes to separate vessels.

The report, issued after months of statewide meetings with communities and consultation with experts, says Alaska and the U.S. government must do more. The 10-member task force of lawmakers, government officials and others discovered "a race to the moon mentality," as countries such as China and Russia build Arctic-hardy vessels while the U.S. trails behind, said Rep. Bryce Edgmon, D-Dillingham, an alternate board member speaking at a press conference on Thursday.

"We are not as prepared as we need to be and not as fully engaged as we should be," he said.

Series of recommendations

Some recommendations from the task force will be presented as resolutions to the state Legislature and Congress. One resolution already sent to the U.S. Senate calls for the U.S. to ratify the United Nations Law of the Sea treaty, a move that would "help legitimize U.S. claims to offshore resources beyond the 200-mile Exclusive Economic Zone," the report said.

Also, the Alaska Legislature should urge Congress to pay for new ice-breakers and support a U.S. Coast Guard base. And an Alaska Arctic commission must be created to develop a comprehensive strategy that helps protect local people and environments.

"Is Alaska going to take a back seat to its own future because other people decide?" asked member and Rep. Bob Herron, D-Bethel, at the press conference. "This summary and this report says no way."

Other recommendations include:

The state, U.S., tribes and local governments should participate in international efforts to develop agreements for shipping, fisheries, oil and gas development. Also, the state should play a greater role in the Arctic Council, an intergovernmental forum addressing Arctic issues.

Additional resources are needed to improve charting and mapping by agencies such as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, particularly of coastal areas and harbor entrances to villages. Maritime hazards have been sparsely studied, and charts used by mariners showing such things as underwater sandbars are decades old. The state, U.S. and industry should work to improve oil-spill prevention and response plans in the region. Also, the University of Alaska should establish an oil spill research center.

Designated sea routes and better tracking are needed to help ships safely transit the Bering Strait and other areas. Also, the Automatic Identification System must be extended for vessel tracking to waters off Alaska and Canada.

Contingency plans must be required for ships traveling in Arctic waters, and the U.S. and state should work together and internationally to finalize the Polar Code. The code would establish ship guidelines for such things as safe speeds and emergency plans if no help is nearby.

The Aleutian Islands Risk Assessment, a multi-agency effort to make shipping safer in the Bering Sea and near the Aleutian Islands, must be completed. Also, the state should support and participate in the United States Coast Guard Port Access Route Study for the Bering Strait, to help create travel corridors in the area.

Contact Alex DeMarban at alex(at)alaskadispatch.com

For more stories from Alaska Dispatch, click here.