When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  USA  Business  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Photo by Alaska Dispatch.
Photo by Alaska Dispatch.
Effective Tuesday, an 11-member group of high level federal employees is now tasked with managing the process by which oil and gas development in Alaska proceeds. David Hayes, the deputy secretary of the Department of the Interior, will chair the newly formed Interagency Working Group and Coordination of Domestic Energy Development and Permitting in Alaska.

The group is "to coordinate the efforts of federal agencies responsible for overseeing the safe and responsible development of onshore and offshore energy resources and associated infrastructure in Alaska and to help reduce our dependence on foreign oil," according to an executive order signed Tuesday by President Barack Obama.

Working with Hayes will be representatives from the departments of Defense, Commerce, Agriculture, Energy, and Homeland Security, the Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects, Council on Environmental Quality, Office of Science and Technology Policy, Office of Management and Budget, and the National Security Staff.

Alaska's Senate delegation believes it's a good move. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, ranking member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, called the group "a positive step forward." Sen. Mark Begich called it "a step in the right direction." Meanwhile, Alaska Gov. Sean Parnell said he was "cautiously optimistic" that the president's efforts will lead to real reform of the federal permitting process.

Tribal governments, traditional knowledge to be considered

The group is supposed to coordinate "engagement" with the state of Alaska and local communities, including tribal governments, and it is specifically directed to "ensure that the sharing and integrity of scientific and environmental information and cultural and traditional knowledge among agencies to support the permit evaluation process of onshore and offshore energy development projects in Alaska."

For Gov. Parnell, the overtures fall short. "I am concerned that the state of Alaska was not granted a seat in this working group, nor is our unique role and responsibilities with regard to permitting acknowledged," Parnell said. "Nevertheless, the state will participate to the fullest extent allowed."

As the group works to streamline the permitting process, it must also protect human health, the environment and indigenous populations, according to the president's order.

"That's really lipstick on a pig," responded Brendan Cummings, senior counsel for the Center for Biological Diversity, hurling back a phrase Obama lobbed at the McCain-Palin campaign during a speech in September 2008. "It's essentially a directive to federal agencies to start approving drilling in the Arctic."

Murkowski has said she plans to make sure the group closes "what has been an endless loop of approvals, appeals and delays -- delays caused by special interest groups opposed to improving our energy security and the jobs it would create."

Opponents fear Arctic drilling to be accelerated

Project opponents are not, however, losing their voice. They still have the ability to participate in public comment periods and go to court when they feel safety or environmental standards are not being met. But Cummings believes Obama's executive order gives the regulatory agencies the green light to cut corners as long as permits are getting approved and projects are moving forward.

"Unfortunately, the overriding message from this executive order is to speed up the process of approving drilling in the Arctic," he said.

"It is the Obama administration accepting the Shell-Murkowski-Begich frame that the reason drilling hasn't been approved is that it is due to some fault of the agencies. If agencies were actually following the law they probably couldn't be approving Shell's drilling plans -- or anyone else's -- in the Arctic," he said, referring to inadequate oil spill response capabilities for the Arctic Ocean.

Cummings also believes the new working group signals that the White House presumes drilling is the best move for the nation's energy future. Questions like whether fostering the fossil fuel industry in an age of climate change is even wise, or whether alternative energy methods should be pursued, appear to have gotten lost, he said.

"[The executive order] adopts Big Oil's rhetoric that we can drill our way to independence and we can do that by streamlining federal approval processes. It's the wrong answer to the wrong question," he said.

Originally posted July 12, 2011