When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  USA  Business  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
alaskasnextgasoption
Alaska's Next Gas Option
Lawmakers last week expressed their anxiety about the state's multi-million dollar commitment to a natural gas pipeline that appears stalled by proposing legislation that would give the state an out if the project is not economic.That immediately set folks to asking: What's Plan B? The state has been trying for more than 30 years to market the abundant natural gas on the North Slope. If this gas line plan falls through, what next?

In 2008, the Legislature at the behest of then Gov. Sarah Palin agreed to a contract with TransCanada that gave the Canadian energy company up to $500 million to help with pre-construction costs of a gas line that could run from Prudhoe Bay all the way into central Canada.

Last summer, both TransCanada and the BP-ConocoPhillips venture solicited bids aimed at gauging interest from customers in shipping gas through the pipeline, Neither has revealed the results of those bids, and TransCanada has said it needs more time to work out conditions. That's made lawmakers and others question whether there is really enough interest and whether the state should continue to subsidize it. House GOP leaders last week introduced a bill that sets a deadline for TransCanada and Gov. Sean Parnell to prove that the gas line is economically feasible.

Then on Wednesday, ConocoPhillips and Marathon Oil told employees at their Nikiski LNG plant the companies would close the facility as soon as April. The market for liquefied natural gas, primarily Asia, is just not there, the companies said, raising more questions about the economic realities of selling Alaska gas Outside.

Lawmakers were quick to point out that at the same time Railbelt utilities are seriously considering importing LNG to make up for a lack of gas needed to keep the lights on in the most populous areas.

Now, proponents of other gas projects are smelling blood in the political waters and they're circling Juneau armed with power points and proposals. Legislators' angst over the TransCanada project, the closing of the Nikiski gas export plant and the notion of importing gas to a state that is supposedly full of it has certainly churned up the talk about other possibilities for getting Alaska gas off the Slope and put to use in Alaska.

Here's a look at some of those ideas and where they're at:

The 'Bullet Line' Proposal

This is the in-state gas line that has generally been viewed as the fall-back plan if the TransCanada pipeline failed to work out. The current vision is for a 24-inch pipeline -- half the diameter of a big gas line to Canada or Valdez -- that would run from Prudhoe to the Fairbanks area then along the Parks Highway to the Anchorage area.

Alaska's Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Mark Begich last week reintroduced a bill that would authorize a right-of-way along the highway through Denali National Park, but a spokesman for Murkowski said that was just coincidental and wasn't intended to be a statement on whether the TransCanada project was in trouble.

Dan Fauske, who heads the state agency spearheading the bullet line option, said last week his agency is "in this kind of weird position" because it's not really in competition with TransCanada or the BP-ConocoPhillips project. He thinks the bullet line could just as easily become a spur line off a larger line and that it's not an "either or" proposition.