When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  USA  Business  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Alaska Dispatch.
Alaska Dispatch.
With drilling plans halted last year pending an equipment review, when will BP reach its Liberty offshore oil prospect in Alaska's Arctic?

Around the same time the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, contracted by BP, disastrously attempted to set new depth records in the Gulf of Mexico, BP had another technologically remarkable project under way in the Arctic.

From an island-based well in Prudhoe Bay in northern Alaska, BP's Liberty project was set to bore beneath the Beaufort Sea and snake through miles of bedrock to reach a 100-million-barrel reservoir.

Whether BP will pull it off remains to be seen. No drilling has begun. No big profits have started to flow.

Had the company started drilling this year as planned, BP had expected Liberty would be producing 40,000 barrels of oil a day -- worth more than $4 million a day at current oil prices -- by 2013.

BP hired Parker Drilling to custom-build a rig capable of drilling two miles down and six to eight miles across to reach its target. Such ultra-extended-reach drilling is on the cutting edge of drilling technology, and BP has shown great pride in the potential of its long-distance wells.

The technology is increasingly being deployed to tap once-difficult-to-reach oil fields. In May 2008, for instance, a well in the Middle East's Arabian Peninsula set a world record for horizontal drilling. Looking to tap an offshore in the North Sea, Maersk Oil & Gas drilled its way 7.6 miles to Qatar's Al-Shaheen Field, with 6.7 of those miles along a horizontal path.

At first, BP slowed the project amid the post-Deepwater Horizon regulatory clampdown. Then the company slowed down further, halting installation of the one-of-a-kind rig needed to drill Liberty. Nearly a year later, the rig is still not in operation. BP has been conducting a "design and engineering review" for some time following a decision to stop dealing with incremental problems as they surfaced during the rig's installation.

The rig "has a big job to do, and we need to be confident that all systems are go," said BP spokesman Steve Rinehart in a recent interview. "The project itself is moving forward. We need to make sure that the rig is up to spec."

Rinehart would not say how much of the rig had been built before continued construction was called off in Nov. 2010. At the time Rinehart explained the work stop to Reuters as a way for the company to "review the huge rig's safety systems, including power and mud-handling systems."

Only when the design review is complete will the company begin to craft a new drilling timeline, he said.

Promising technology

The potential for extended-reach drilling to help deliver more of Alaska's oil and gas to market has renewed interest in accessing oil in environmentally and politically sensitive areas.

As recently as August, U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski was touting its benefits as a way to responsibly target the some 10.4 billion barrels of oil thought to exist within the part of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge designated for oil and gas exploration.

"Now is the time for us to open ANWR for development," Murkowski said in a prepared statement responding to recommendations that directional drilling be tested as a way to enter ANWR. She called it "a commonsense solution that everyone should be able to embrace.

"We need to develop our own domestic resources instead of continuing to rely on foreign oil," she said.

Regulators still must review drilling plan

Last month, the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission held hearings on the safety and effectiveness of its policies for blowout preventers and extended-reach drilling. The commission regulates drilling activity on state land and has jurisdiction over Liberty's wellhead at Endicott Island, from which BP plans to drill its well. Before it can do so, BP will need approval from the state commission and the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.

Originally posted October 3, 2011