When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  USA  Business  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
On Thursday the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement approved a 2012 Beaufort Sea exploratory drilling plan for Shell Offshore, Inc., a decision long awaited by the oil company, which saw its plans put on hold in the regulatory aftermath of the Gulf of Mexico's Deepwater Horizon oil spill in April 2010.

"The conditional approval of our Plan of Exploration is welcome news and adds to our cautious optimism that we will be drilling our Alaska leases by this time next year," said Curtis Smith, a spokesperson for Shell's Alaska operations.

Shell's plans in the Beaufort Sea call for drilling up to four exploratory wells over two years. The company is also pursuing drilling along Alaska's western Arctic Coast in the Chukchi Sea under a separate permit.

Politicians welcome decision

Alaska's congressional delegation heralded the announcement. Alaskan senators Lisa Murkowski and Mark Begich welcomed the decision, with a prepared statement from Begich's office calling it a "needed shot in the arm for Alaska's long-term economic good health." Rep. Don Young said BOEMRE's green light was "an important development" for Alaska:

"I have always said that with less oil flowing through the trans-Alaska pipeline and North Slope production declining, it's crucial to Alaska's economic future that we start developing new areas in Alaska. Shell has invested billions of dollars and worked very hard with both state and federal officials in developing a plan to drill offshore in Alaska. While today's decision by BOEMRE is a welcome one, I remain cautiously optimistic that the Obama Administration will issue the necessary permits and authorizations needed in order for Shell to start drilling on time a year from now."

Environmental groups raise alarm

Meanwhile, drilling opponents who maintain too little is known about the Arctic marine environment and of the ability to clean up an oil spill in the region, are not pleased. A press release issued jointly by more than a dozen groups opposed to offshore Arctic drilling -- including the Sierra Club, Northern Alaska Environmental Center, Alaska Wilderness League, Oceana and the Natural Resources Defense Council -- blasted the federal decision, with one group accusing the government of putting Alaska's Arctic environment "on thin ice."

"The toxic pollution and noisy disturbance from the exploration wells threaten refuge resources dependent upon marine and nearshore estuary waters, as well as surrounding coastal habitats so vital to polar bears, migratory birds, caribou, Alaska Native subsistence, and recreation," said Pamela Miller, a spokesperson with the Fairbanks-based Northern Alaska Environmental Center.

"Our preeminent wilderness refuge deserves better care than the offshore agency has shown," she added, referring to the threat her group believed that Shell drilling posed for the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

Rebecca Noblin, Alaska's director for the Center for Biological Diversity, accused the Obama administration of "rubber-stamping" Arctic offshore drilling despite recommendations by the president's own oil spill commission, appointed in the wake of the Gulf spill.

Oil spill response in place says company

In a prepared statement, BOEMRE director Michael Bromwich said the federal decision was based on the "best scientific information available" on Arctic energy exploration and development.

"We will closely review and monitor Shell's proposed activities to ensure that any activities that take place under this plan will be conducted in a safe and environmentally responsible manner," Bromwich added.

Shell spokesman Smith said the company had worked to "build confidence" in its Arctic explorations and stood ready "to deploy the most robust Arctic oil spill response system known to industry.

"Shell has shown that our oil spill response capability exceeds our calculated worst-case discharge volume for the wells being proposed," he added.

Precautions Shell is pursuing include designing an "oil spill capping system, which is designed to capture hydrocarbons at the source in the extremely unlikely event of a shallow water blowout," according to Smith.

Other permits required before drilling go-ahead

Those precautions must have impressed federal regulators. Thursday's announcement comes on the heels of a statement by Admiral Robert Papp, commander of the U.S. Coast Guard, to Congress that his branch of the military had "zero" capability of cleaning up an oil spill in icy Arctic waters.

Shell's drilling plan is not, however, entirely free from potential obstacles. Before any drilling takes place, the permit from BOEMRE requires Shell to also obtain permits from the Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, and the National Marine Fisheries Service.

In making its permitting decision, "BOEMRE found no evidence that the proposed action would significantly affect the quality of the human environment," according to a press release from the agency, which notes it relied in part on new information about energy development in the Arctic released in a June 2011 report from the U.S. Geological Survey.

Originally posted August 4, 2011