When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  Sweden  Business  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Forsmark nuclear power station, north of Stockholm. Sweden has ten nuclear reactors and imports uranium fuel. The country's only uranium mine was closed in 1969 after four years in operation. Foto: tomas Oneborg/Scanpix.
Forsmark nuclear power station, north of Stockholm. Sweden has ten nuclear reactors and imports uranium fuel. The country's only uranium mine was closed in 1969 after four years in operation. Foto: tomas Oneborg/Scanpix.
Listen:

High ore prices and rising demand from nuclear power stations are causing a uranium prospecting boom in Sweden.

Uranium mining was stopped in 1969 due to public opinion. Now uranium exploration companies, mainly from Canada and Australia are prospecting in nearly 250 locations around the country. Yet most local councils say they will use their veto to prevent any new mines from opening.

Sweden has close to a third (27 percent) of Europe's uranium deposits, according to the Geological Survey of Sweden. The country imports uranium for its ten nuclear reactors.

Imports or 'own backyard'

"More or less 50 percent of Sweden's energy comes from nuclear power," Folke Söderström, CEO of Mawson Energi, a Canadian owned prospecting company, told Radio Sweden.

"And we want to give the Swedish authorities the opportunity to decide where the uranium comes from – if we're going to import it from other countries or if we're going to take it from our own backyard."

Local councils in Sweden have the power to veto uranium mining permits, but they cannot stop companies searching for uranium.

Arvidsjaur, a sparsely populated inland district, two hours from Boden - is one of the areas where Mawson Energi has contracted out test drilling. Locals have long known that there is uranium in the area - there are traces of it in rocks lying in fields, and tests have shown high natural radiation levels.

Fierce opposition

But there is fierce opposition to mining it and the local council has issued an outright ban.

"We think that having a uranium mine would damage our image as one of Europe's last wildernesses," explained Jerry Johansson, leader of the local council.

"We want to be an attractive destination for tourists. And having a clean environment is very important for us."

Although local opposition to uranium mining often focuses on the danger of radioactive leaks, the effect on the landscape can be far more significant, according to Olof Holmstrand, a geological engineer and advisor to the "No to Uranium" network.

"There is very little uranium in the Swedish uranium ores – so you have to mine a very large quantity to get out a useful amount. And that will influence the landscape and surroundings to a very large extent," he said.

"To feed Sweden's current nuclear reactors, you would have to mine about one square kilometre of land per year."

Long process

Given the level of opposition - a majority of the country's local authorities are against uranium mining - why has the Swedish government approved hundreds of prospecting projects - sometimes against the will of local communities which have lodged appeals?

Åsa Persson, head of the Swedish Mining Inspectorate, says that just because companies are searching for various ores and minerals, including uranium, it does not mean they will actually find anything.

"Prospecting is a very long process - it takes a really long time to find anything. We issue about 200 exploration permits every year but only approve two or three mining applications annually," she said.

"And prospecting is not that invasive - it makes no difference really what you are looking for. What's important is whether or not you get approval to mine. There are stringent checks before that can happen and local authorities have their veto, including for uranium."

What future for local veto?

But some Swedish environmental groups warn that rising uranium prices could lead some areas with high unemployment to allow mining for economic reasons.

And with Sweden dependent on uranium imports for its ten nuclear reactors, some fear the local veto could eventually be scrapped.

"For the moment it's not very likely – no party in Sweden has said anything like that," said Olof Holmstrand from the "No to Uranium" network.

"But on the other hand, the veto is based on a normal law and it can be changed with one decision in the parliament."

Arvidsjaur council leader Jerry Johansson says such a decision would be political dynamite.

"For centuries the Swedish system has given local authorities strong decision making powers. Scrapping the veto would be like putting your head in the mouth of a lion."