When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  Sweden  Environment  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Listen:

A Swedish icebreaker has been contracted to a US company involved in Arctic oil prospecting, north east of Greenland, sparking a protest from the environmental group Greenpeace.

They say the fragile environment of the Arctic and the lessons learned from BP's catastrophic oil spill in the Mexican Gulf mean that Sweden should push for a ban on Arctic oil drilling instead of helping to make it happen.

"They are there to explore the possibility to extract oil and gas from the sea bed. And to do that in this extremely vulnerable habitat, we are completely against that," Dr Therese Jacobson, a campaigner and microbiologist at Greenpeace Nordic, told Radio Sweden.

The state-owned icebreaker, Oden, reached the Artic late last week and is on hire until October to GX Technology, which carries out seismic mapping of the sea bed for oil and gas companies. Among its list of clients are the oil giants, British Petroleum and Shell.

Tomas Årnell, head of ship management at the Swedish Maritime Administration, says that the Oden is in the Arctic for research purposes and to provide icebreaking services.

"We are doing this job for companies for research purposes, "he said. "We don't know if it's for oil prospecting – but of course that's one of the reasons I think."

Valuable revenue

While the Obama administration attempts to ban offshore drilling in the US, in the wake of the Mexican Gulf oil spill, the European Union has given the go-ahead for drilling in Europe. Norway and Denmark have approved dozens of test drills in the Arctic Sea.

Contracting out icebreakers brings in valuable revenue for the Swedish Maritime Administration – in the region of $4 million this year - which is ploughed back in to the costly running of the fleet.

"It's good that she [the Oden] works up there and shows her capability. And we get a lot of income and that is one of our missions at the maritime administration – to try to hire them out," he said.

"If we don't do it someone else will do it, maybe with another ship not as good as the Oden, and then it could be dangerous for them."

A ban on Arctic oil drilling

Greenpeace say that it's hypocritical to dispatch icebreakers, like the Oden, on polar research expeditions one year and then on sea bed mapping for oil prospecting the next year.

They want Sweden to pull out of any oil related projects in the region and to push for a moratorium on Arctic oil drilling, similar to the one in place in the Antarctic.

"Offshore drilling should be banned. We don't have any safe ways of doing this and we are risking the entire Arctic – it's not moral and it's not right," said Jacobson.

"Sweden has said we want to protect the Arctic and work for a good Arctic environment and this is a step in the opposite direction, facilitating oil exploration in the area."

More: Radio Sweden

Comments  

 
#3 arctic drillingHusky 2010-07-29 16:21
Cnies involved:
transatlantic AB Sweden / Transviking Norway
Platform stena don - drillship stena forth
north west greenland / Disko-baffin bay

A friend of the North
Quote
 
 
#2 Arctic drillingHusky 2010-07-29 16:17
Cnies involved:
Transatlantic AB Sweden / Transviking offshore Norway
platform stena don and drillship stena forth
North west greenland disko sector / Baffin bay
Quote
 
 
#1 Arctic drillingHusky 2010-07-29 16:15
Cnies involved:
Transatlantic AB Sweden / Transviking offshore Norway in the Baffin bay / northwest Greenland-Disko sector
with platform Stena Don and drill ship Stena Forth.
Quote