When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  Russia  Environment  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Increasing freshwater on the U.S. and Canadian side of the Arctic is balanced by decreasing freshwater on the Russian side. Blue represents maximum freshwater increases and yellows and oranges represent maximum freshwater decreases. Graphic courtesy: University of Washington. Alaska Dispatch.
Increasing freshwater on the U.S. and Canadian side of the Arctic is balanced by decreasing freshwater on the Russian side. Blue represents maximum freshwater increases and yellows and oranges represent maximum freshwater decreases. Graphic courtesy: University of Washington. Alaska Dispatch.
Fresh water sloshing into the polar sea from the great rivers of Russia has been collecting on the Alaskan and Canadian side of the Arctic, adding the equivalent of 10 feet of freshwater to the central Beaufort Sea between 2003 and 2008, according to a new study published this month in Nature.

The ocean northeast of Alaska is now the freshest it's been in 50 years, the scientists said, but only a tiny proportion of that can be blamed on ice melt. Most of it can be traced to Eurasian river runoff, following a previously undetected pathway from one side of the world to the other.

"A hemisphere-wide phenomenon — and not just regional forces — has caused record-breaking amounts of freshwater to accumulate in the Arctic's Beaufort Sea," wrote Sandra Hines of the University of Washington in this story.

This eastward redistribution of river runoff was likely caused by the strong counterclockwise circulation in the atmosphere, triggered by the climatic pattern known as the Arctic Oscillation, explained a different story about the study posted online by NASA. Years of cyclonic flow worked to sweep the fresher water along the Siberian coast toward North America.

"We discovered a pathway that allows Russian river runoff to feed the Beaufort gyre," said co-author Ron Kwok, a senior research scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. "The Beaufort High is important, but so are the hemispheric-scale effects of the Arctic Oscillation."

Freshwater not increasing overall

One important finding: the total amount of freshwater has not been increasing overall across the Arctic and therefore isn't threatening to trigger the sort of climate catastrophe portrayed in the pulp movie "The Day After Tomorrow." The 2004 flick dramatized the overnight return of ice age conditions, something considered scientifically preposterous if not wholly impossible. Yet the underlying process is real.

A dramatic increase in the amount of freshwater entering the North Atlantic from the Arctic could slow the global "ocean conveyor belt" that redistributes heat around the home planet and could conceivably chill down Europe by interfering with the Gulf Stream.

But the team led by oceanographer Jamie Morison at the Applied Physics Laboratory of the University of Washington found no change in the net amount of freshwater now in the Arctic — and nothing that might signal a change in the conveyor belt, the NASA story said.

"Knowing the pathways of freshwater in the upper ocean is important to understanding global climate because of freshwater's role in protecting sea ice – it can help create a barrier between the ice and warmer ocean water below – and its role in global ocean circulation," Morrison explained here. "Too much freshwater exiting the Arctic would inhibit the interplay of cold water from the poles and warm water from the tropics."

The study married basic oceanography to rocket science, with Morison and his six co-authors collecting water samples in the field and then using the NASA satellites ICESat and GRACE to analyze oceanographic conditions across thousands of miles. They were the first to draw the connection between the Arctic fresh water circulation and the Arctic Oscillation.

"To me it's pretty spectacular that you have these satellites zipping around hundreds of kilometers above the Earth and they give us a number about salinity that's very close to what we get from lowering little sampling bottles into the ocean," Morison said in the UW story.

For links to a video, photos, other stories and technical background, check out this snazzy web portal about the research, posted by the UW's Applied Physics lab. The research has also drawn extensive media coverage around the web.

Contact Doug O'Harra at doug(at)alaskadispatch.com