When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  Greenland  Business  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Photo: Gustaf Klarin, SR Science Department
Photo: Gustaf Klarin, SR Science Department
Geological studies in Greenland indicate that there are large deposits of valuable minerals in the mountains, and plenty of oil and gas off the coasts. And with the milder climate, it appears to be easier to exploit the nearly untouched Greenland. Today's relatively poor Greenlanders just may be the future new oil sheiks of the Arctic. There is broad political support for oil exploration. Uranium mining however, is dividing the country.

Kalistat Lund is a helicopter pilot, Social Democrat politician and opponent to uranium mining in his home town of Narsaq in southern Greenland.

"Uranium mining is planned in open-cut mines. This entails risk for contamination if operations expand, not the least with consideration to the strong winds that blow through the area and that can carry toxic matter to the town, which is just a few kilometers further down the valley."

But according to Kalistat Lund, the miners themselves are a problem that must be isolated.
"If a mine opens, many specialists will come from other countries, and there is risk that it will be the same as in 50s, 60s and 70s. Skilled Danish workers and other foreigners came to Greenland and they developed the country," says Kalistat Lund. "The Greenlanders didn't participate, we didn't steer our development and we were looked upon as second-class people. We shouldn't repeat the mistake."

Simon Simonsen is the town's mayor.
"We need the mine, unemployment is high and we need it to develop."

The Australian geologist Greg Barnes, a part-owner of the company that wants to mine uranium, is unsure of whether there will be any uranium mining due to the environmental consequences and the opposition to uranium. And the present government has said no to mining.

There is stronger political support for oil. The government estimates that there is the equivalent of 50 billion barrels of oil and gas off the west and east coasts, based on the results of a survey made by the US Geological Survey – USGS.

More than 30 international oil companies have concessions for oil exploration in Greenland.

Fifty billion barrels is 20 billion more th an the Norwegians have pumped up to date, but these figures must be used with considerable caution. This according to Mikael Höök, PhD in global energy resources at Uppsala University.
"The USGS has previously made overly optimistic estimates," says Mikael Höök.

The international environment movement, including Greenpeace, has drawn attention to the problem that the consequences of oil spills in the Arctic climate would take a long time to heal. Another threat to oil rigs is icebergs. Small icebergs can be towed away with boats, but this cannot be done with icebergs of several cubic meters.

The authorities in Greenland however, claim that if an iceberg cannot be moved, that the oil rigs could be disconnected and their bore holes in the sea bottom plugged before the iceberg comes too close.

Niklas Granholm at FOI, a research authority under the Swedish Ministry of Defence, conducts Arctic research and is following with interest developments as to whether Greenland will become independent of Denmark. Will Greenland become a Kuwait in the Arctic or another Micronesia?