When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  Canada  Business  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Hopes for a major port and road to be built in western Nunavut, Canada have been dealt another major blow, as a company trying to build a mine in the region has deemed the project to be too expensive to build and operate.

For years, Kitikmeot Corp. and Nuna Logistics have jointly been pushing for the construction of an all-weather road from mines in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut to a deep-sea port in Bathurst Inlet in Nunavut's western Kitikmeot region.

Minerals and Metals Group (MMG) says it has conducted a pre-feasibility study on the Bathurst Inlet road and port proposal and two other options to ship ore from its proposed Izok base metals mine, located 250 kilometres southeast of Kugluktuk, Nunavut.

The proposal, also known as BIPAR, has called for a road running east from the Izok Lake property, across Contwoyto Lake, and north to a deep-sea port that would be built in the inlet.

Most complex option

"The Bathurst Inlet option ended up being the most expensive and also the most complex," MMG Canada president Martin McFarlane told CBC News Monday from the company's Vancouver office.

"The real issue was that in the middle of it — between the Izok deposit and the coast — is Contwoyto Lake, which is a fairly substantial body of water that we had to cross."

MMG Canada wants to develop a mine at its Izok Lake property, which is believed to be rich in high-grade zinc and copper. But McFarlane said transporting supplies and ore to and from the remote site will be a challenge.

In addition to the Bathurst Inlet proposal, MMG has also been looking at two road options, both of which head north from the mining property to Coronation Gulf. One of the proposed roads runs near Kugluktuk.

"The road and port cost about 50 per cent of the total build cost," McFarlane said.

"The operating costs of moving concentrate to the coast and also, in return, bringing supplies back are about 35 per cent of the total operating costs for the mining project."

Inuit corporation disappointed

MMG Canada's decision not to proceed with the Bathurst road and port project disappointed the Kitikmeot Corp., an Inuit-owned economic development organization that had hoped the project would encourage more mineral exploration and development.

'Things need to happen up here and, you know, hopefully we'll find something that will develop BIPAR.'—Charlie Lyall

Kitikmeot Corp. president Charlie Lyall said he's disappointed "because it's going to delay the development of the region.... The cost of living in the community is going to remain high."

The Inuit corporation and Nuna Logistics initially proposed to build a 211-kilometre road from the port in Bathurst Inlet to various N.W.T. mines, but a technical review was suspended in 2008 amid uncertainty about who would use and pay for the project.

Despite the latest setback, Lyall said he is not giving up on his dream to build a road and port in the Bathurst Inlet area.

"We have to keep plugging along," he said. "Things need to happen up here and, you know, hopefully we'll find something that will develop BIPAR."

MMG Canada hopes to secure the necessary approvals for the Izok mine by 2015 and start full production by 2017. McFarlane said the Bathurst Inlet proposal is so costly and complex that it could jeopardize development of the proposed mine.

"If the project gets built, then all benefits come along with it," he said. "If the project doesn't get built, then no one receives anything from it."