When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  Canada  Business  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
If approved, the 1,200-kilometre natural gas pipeline could be built from the Beaufort Sea through the N.W.T.'s Mackenzie River Valley to a hub in northwestern Alberta. (CBC)
If approved, the 1,200-kilometre natural gas pipeline could be built from the Beaufort Sea through the N.W.T.'s Mackenzie River Valley to a hub in northwestern Alberta. (CBC)
The Mackenzie Valley natural gas pipeline faces a key decision this week as the Canadian National Energy Board is expected to say whether it approves the proposed project.

The board, which regulates parts of Canada's energy sector, is expected to release its decision sometime this week on whether the $16.2-billion pipeline being proposed in the Northwest Territories would be in the interests of all Canadians.

If approved, the 1,200-kilometre pipeline could transport natural gas from the Beaufort Sea, through the Mackenzie River Valley south to a hub in northwestern Alberta, where it would connect with existing networks.

The gas would come from three "anchor fields" located near the Beaufort Sea in the Mackenzie Delta.

Calgary-based Imperial Oil is the lead company in the consortium that is spearheading the pipeline. The consortium also includes ExxonMobil Corp., ConocoPhillips, Royal Dutch Shell PLC and the Aboriginal Pipeline Group.

"Certainly we'll be looking for a favourable decision on the pipeline," said Fred Carmichael of the Aboriginal Pipeline Group, which represents three N.W.T. aboriginal groups that have negotiated a one-third stake in the pipeline.

"Hopefully it will be favourable so we can keep moving forward on the project."

While the idea of building a gas pipeline from the Beaufort Sea to southern Canada has existed since the 1970s, Imperial Oil and its partners began looking at the possibility again in 2000.

The current pipeline proposal has since been winding its way slowly through the regulatory process. From 2004 until 2009, the Joint Review Panel consulted northerners about the environmental and socio-economic impacts of the proposed pipeline.

Emotional debates

The panel conducted public and technical hearings in the N.W.T., often sparking emotional debates between pipeline supporters who believe a pipeline would pump jobs and money into the territory, and critics who worry the project would open vast areas of the territory to environmental damage and social disruption.

 The Joint Review Panel approved the project in December 2009, on the condition that its 176 recommendations are implemented by the pipeline proponents, the federal and territorial governments.

The panel's report was forwarded to the National Energy Board, which held its own round of hearings earlier this year. The board's decision will be subject to final approval by the federal cabinet.

Calgary-based energy analyst Doug Matthews said he expects the NEB to approve the project. Matthews said what he really wants to know is how much time the board will give the companies to decide whether they actually want to build the pipeline.

The consortium currently has until 2013 to make that decision, but Imperial Oil has told the NEB it wants more time as it waits for markets to improve.

Imperial Oil spokesman Pius Rolheiser said the company also wants to secure a financial commitment from the federal government.

"Certainly should we receive approval with acceptable conditions, it would be a significant, positive, critical step in the journey," Rolheiser said.

"But this is a journey of many steps and we're not there yet."