When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  Canada  Society  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
The Canadian government's recent effort to assert its sovereignty in the Arctic has reignited calls for a university to be created in the North.

Canada is the only circumpolar nation that does not have its own Arctic-based university, said Frances Abele, a professor of public policy and administration at Carleton University in Ottawa.

Currently, there is no university in Canada's North. Colleges in Nunavut, the Northwest Territories and Yukon have teamed up with universities elsewhere to offer select degree programs, but in many cases, northern students must travel far from home to pursue their post-secondary education.

"In order for us to have a globally credible claim, we need healthy communities, we need a well-educated northern population and we need a certain degree of social and economic stability in the North," Abele told CBC News.

"All of those things would be advanced by the existence of a northern university."

Abele said federal money would be required to create a northern university. As well, she said there will have to be a debate over whether a northern university should have one campus or many campuses across the region.

"There's no easy answer to it," she said. "Maybe there should be a campus or a university in each territory.

"Obviously, with the population size of the North, we'd have to look at the cost of that and how you could do it in a way that was economically feasible."

Sovereignty tour

The idea of establishing a northern university is not new, but the topic has been renewed by Prime Minister Stephen Harper's tour of the North last month — the fifth such tour in as many years.

During the tour, Harper observed the Canadian Forces' annual summer Arctic sovereignty exercise, dubbed Operation Nanook.

The prime minister also announced that the western Nunavut community of Cambridge Bay will be the site of a world-class Arctic research station.

But Nelson Wiseman, a political science professor at the University of Toronto, said Harper is more interested in building his image than he is in developing the North.

"You get better visuals in the North because the landscape is so dramatically different," Wiseman said.

"He's got the military at his fingertips. They escort him around, and he's photographed with military people and also locals. You know, he sees that as boosting his image, and the major target is southern Canada."

Wiseman said Harper has been slow to deliver on promises of Arctic patrol vessels and icebreakers.

But Conservatives in the Western Arctic riding, which encompasses the Northwest Territories, argue that nothing symbolizes Harper's commitment to Arctic sovereignty better than his physical presence in the region.

"The prime minister sees the North as the next frontier for development for Canada, as a great asset for Canada," said Bill Aho, executive secretary of the Western Arctic Conservative party association.

"He sees the potential there, and he wants to have the North contributing to our federal economy as a partner in Canada."

Aho pointed to the creation of CanNor, an economic development agency in the North, as a symbol of the Conservative government's commitment there. As well, he noted that Harper has elevated a northern MP, Leona Aglukkaq of Nunavut, to a senior cabinet position — that of minister of health.

Comments  

 
#2 SymbolicJavis 2010-09-03 06:32
In my opinion A university in the north sounds like a great idea on paper, but our territory cant even build a bridge without it costing trumendous amounts more money than it should have done. If we cant even build a bridge, why bother with something as complex as a university ? Further more what are we going to put in the university ? Where are the teachers? Where are the students? The colleges are small as it is. There are not enough teachers (who are QUALIFIED to teach) and not enough students to be taught. Nobody can afford to live up here as it is and there are serious, real issues to do with sustainability and cost of living, social issues that money pumped into a university could do for the people of the north.
Quote
 
 
#1 University = Sovereignty?hexner 2010-09-02 12:48
I agree with the need for better post-secondary opportunities in the North, but Abele should check her international law. I can't see how having a university would help our legal dispute over the Northwest Passage, which is about transit rights, or the extent of our continental shelf, which is a geological issue. I am also frustrated by attempts to justify any kind of social progress in the North by its utility to our international legal case for sovereignty - as if the lines on a map are somehow more important than the social progress itself.
Quote