When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  Canada  Society  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

CBC.ca
CBC.ca
Former students of native residential schools in Canada say they are being mistreated by lawyers who are supposed to help them claim federal compensation, but are instead taking their award money in some cases.

The National Residential School Survivors' Society, which represents about 32,000 former students across Canada, is calling on law societies to do more to discipline lawyers who are taking advantage of those who are applying for compensation.

Society spokesman Ted Quewezance said some survivors are being told their claims are bogus, while others are having problems with the lawyers they have hired.

"We get complaints regarding lawyers — lawyers cherry-picking certain cases, only taking cases which are lucrative, and denying the little people," Quewezance told reporters Thursday in Winnipeg.

Some lawyers are taking money for services that are not being provided, and some are taking more money than what they are entitled to receive, he added.

The Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement, formalized in 2007, includes a Common Experience Payment in which verified former students receive $10,000 each for the first year they attended residential schools, plus $3,000 for each successive year.

The federal agreement also includes an Independent Assessment Process that provides compensation to claims of serious sexual, physical or any form of abuse that caused psychological damage to former students.

Lawyers receive 15 per cent of the compensation award as their fee, but they can also charge clients up to 15 per cent more.

But some former students claim they have had to pay more than half of their compensation money to lawyers.

"A lot of them feel that it's just an extension of how they were treated in residential schools," said Mike Cachagee, the society's acting executive director.

Society wants judicial review

The society is also demanding a judicial review of the $1.9-billion residential schools settlement agreement, as well as more time for former students to apply for compensation.

"We got serious problems with the courts. We got serious problems with lawyers that are out there. And we got problems with Canada," said Quewezance. "Essentially all have abdicated their responsibilities."

But officials with the federal Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Department said there is no requirement for a judicial review, and there is no plan to reopen the settlement agreement.
Quewezance said he may look to international courts to review some of the issues that residential school survivors are facing.

A total of about 130 schools operated across Canada — excluding Newfoundland, Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick — from the earliest in the 19th century to the last, which closed in 1996.

All in all, about 150,000 aboriginal, Inuit and Métis children were removed from their communities and forced to attend the church-run, government-funded schools, which aimed to assimilate them into European-Canadian society.

Law society monitors situation

The chief adjudicator of the national compensation process has already warned lawyers twice against taking advantage of their vulnerable clients.

The British Columbia Supreme Court recently ordered an investigation into a Calgary-based law firm for allegedly mishandling residential school compensation awards.

In January, Winnipeg lawyer Howard Tennenhouse was suspended from practising after it was alleged that he was taking payments beyond those permitted by an adjudicator.

The allegations against Tennenhouse deal with about 50 of his clients, all of whom are residential school survivors. The Law Society of Manitoba is scheduled to hold a conduct inquiry later this month.

Allan Fineblit, chief executive officer of the Manitoba law society, said his organization is monitoring the overall situation "extremely closely."

"Not only are you dealing with, in some cases, large amounts of money, but you're also dealing with highly vulnerable people. Many of these people have suffered great trauma as a result of what happened to them. It's very difficult for them to talk about their experiences," Fineblit said.

"We're the regulator of the legal profession, and our job is to protect the public."