| Arctic ice is melting faster than previously thought, raising projections of global sea level rise this century. (John McConnico/Associated Press) |
Scientists have long puzzled over why Arctic sea ice is retreating at up to three times the rate that climate models say it should.
In an effort to answer that question, a group of U.K-based explorers walked more than 500 kilometres of sea ice in the High Arctic, taking temperature readings of the ocean below them.
They found a layer of cold, salty water about 200 metres down that they suspect has come from the melting of first-year ice.
That meltwater has forced the relatively warmer water to the surface, where it's speeding up the decay of more ice.
'Complicated processes'
"We're trying to understand why the ice is melting so fast," said Simon Boxall of the Catlin Arctic Survey. "It's not just down to simple warming. There are more complicated processes."
The speed at which sea ice is disappearing in the Arctic has far exceeded almost all predictions and alarmed climate scientists.
A 2007 paper from the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colo., found that the projections of the UN-sponsored Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change were already obsolete three years after they were published.
When projections from the panel were compared with actual observations, the authors found that between 1953 and 2006 the sea ice was retreating three times faster than it should have. Between 1979 and 2006, when satellite data was available, the actual retreat was twice as fast as climate models predicted.
The report concluded that sea ice retreat is 30 years ahead of where scientists thought it would be.
"Decay of the ice cover is proceeding more rapidly than expected based on the model simulations," said the report published in Geophysical Research Letters.
Polar trek
The team at the Catlin Arctic Survey, sponsored by the Catlin Group insurance company, thought the answer might lie in different temperatures at different levels of Arctic seas.
Such data is usually obtained from ships. But during the spring, when melting is greatest, there's still too much sea ice for ships to make it through.
So the scientists walked from Borden Island to Ellef Ringnes Island and also from near the North Pole all the way down to the northern tip of Ellesmere Island, slogging about 10 kilometres a day in below-deep-freeze temperatures over rugged, uneven ice.
What they found was a surprise — a layer of seawater about 200 metres below the surface that was actually colder than when it had been measured by previous expeditions.
"That's counterintuitive," said Boxall. "We would expect to see, with global warming, warming conditions generally."
But when they realized that the colder water was also saltier than they expected, an explanation began to suggest itself.
Boxall points out that the older sea ice is, the less salt it contains. Ice that's two or three years old already contains very little salt.
Saltier, denser water
Year-old ice, however, remains fairly salty. And when it melts, it produces meltwater that's denser than the relatively fresh water from older ice.
As multi-year ice declines throughout the Arctic, more of the saltier meltwater from younger ice is mixing into the ocean. That colder, denser water sinks more quickly and forces less dense water from deeper in the ocean up to the surface.
Because fresh meltwater is colder than seawater, that means relatively warm water is being forced upwards. And that, said Boxall, may be part of the reason that sea ice is melting so much faster than anyone thought it would.
"What we're seeing is that [fresh meltwater] being taken away from the surface and replaced by slightly warmer water," said Boxall. "The evidence is that the surface waters are [now] slightly warmer."
More research needed
Boxall cautions that his conclusions are based on a preliminary review of data that the team brought back from the ice.
"We need to compare our results with previous data and with groups from other areas."
A paper is being prepared for publication.
The results do show that the effects of climate change and global warming are not always obvious, suggested Boxall.
"The evidence is that there's something interesting going on. The fact that [the climate] is getting warmer is one reason for the ice melting, but it's more complex than that."





Comments
You are ignoring the heat loss through sea ice, which increases as the ice gets thinner (see my reply to Nik from NYC).
During the winter heat loss through the sea ice to the atmosphere cools the surface layer. Previously the sea ice was mainly multi year ice, so yes was nearly freshwater. However in recent years it has become mainly first-year ice, so is saltier, as is it's melt. The abyssal water is warmer than the surface but previously it did not rise to the surface as much due to the halocline - abyssal water was saltier than the fresh water from sea ice melt. Now as most of the sea ice is first year (e.g. Nghiem 2007 "Rapid reduction of Arctic perennial sea ice.") the balance has tipped and the saltier sea ice melt is able to sink, to be replaced by warmer abyssal waters. The abyssal waters aren't so warm as to melt much sea ice, but their presence near the surface affects heat fluxes so can lead to more melting.
The Arctic sea-ice has not recovered from 2007. It has continued to decline.
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.area.arctic.png
In May of the last 3 years the Alfred Wegner Institute flew surveys to validate Cryosat. They found that Arctic sea-ice off the Candian Arctic Archipelago declined from 1.7 (2009) to 1.4 (2011) metres thick. This in an area that once had ice some 3 metres thick. In "Decline in Arctic sea ice thickness from submarine and ICESat records: 1958–2008" Kwok & Rothrock state: "The peak winter thickness of 3.64 m in 1980 (in the submarine data, RPW08) decreased to 1.89 m by the winter of 2008 (in the ICESat record, K09), a net decrease of 1.75 m or 48% in thickness."
There has been no recovery in the Arctic. There will be no recovery as fossil fuel CO2 emissions will not abate.
In 2010 they accepted “That this House would put economic growth before combating climate change” by 135 votes to 110."
Today's view of this summer's "ice free" Arctic is here: http://tinyurl.com/icefreearctic
Consensus: There is an ether that pervades space. Continents don’t move (despite an obvious jigsaw puzzle match between them)! Dirty hands don’t kill surgical patients! Children are a blank slate, personality wise with no genetic influence! The best therapy is to treat human beings as if we were shocking pigeons and ringing bells for dogs. Non-coding DNA is just “junk”. Man will never fly. Viruses have nothing to do with ulcers or certain cancers. Bacterial spontaneously generate. Dietary cholesterol dominates heart disease occurrence just as CO2 dominates the latest warming trend.
Denial: http://i.min.us/ibyADs.jpg
Oceans: http://k.min.us/idAw6Y.gif
NASA: http://i.min.us/idFxzI.jpg
Thremometers: http://i.min.us/idAOoE.gif
Earth: http://k.min.us/ibtB8G.gif
Ice: http://k.min.us/ibBgw2.jpg
Authority: http://k.min.us/iby6xe.gif
Prophecy: http://i.min.us/idEHdo.jpg
Psychopathy: http://i.min.us/ibubmk.jpg
Icon: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmPzLzj-3XY
Thinker: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n92YenWfz0Y
-=NikFromNYC=- Ph.D. in Carbon Chemistry (Columbia/Harvard)
Ice: http://k.min.us/ibBgw2.jpg
The LA Times featured cold fusion in '89 before its debunking. Greens were aghast!
“It’s like giving a machine gun to an idiot child.” – Paul Ehrlich (mentor of John Cook of the SkepticalScienc e blog, author of "Climate Change Denial")
“Clean-burning, non-polluting, hydrogen-using bulldozers still could knock down trees or build housing developments on farmland.” – Paul Ciotti (LA Times)
“It gives some people the false hope that there are no limits to growth and no environmental price to be paid by having unlimited sources of energy.” – Jeremy Rifkin (NY Times)
“Many people assume that cheaper, more abundant energy will mean that mankind is better off, but there is no evidence for that.” – Laura Nader (sister of Ralph)
Bill
They are ignorant of the fact that as sea water cools, it becomes denser, and sinks, leaving some relatively fresher water above. This freezes at a higher temperature. The ice also becomes less salty through salt exclusion, becoming nearly pure water in a few years. But, after even one winter, some salt is lost, and the ice’s melt point goes still higher.
But to these science challenged polar hikers, melting ice sinks into the heavier, colder brine below, and reduces the temperature of the brine.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/reference-pages/sea-ice-page/
Bill
In other words, the melting ice will actually have a higher temperature than the water below it.
This is a "freshman stupid" mistake. No real arctic scientist would make this mistake.
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.area.arctic.png
RSS feed for comments to this post