When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  Canada  Environment  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
The federal government wants to put a price tag on polar bears, and has commissioned a study to appraise the animal's value as a national icon. (Jonathan Hayward/Canadian Press)
The federal government wants to put a price tag on polar bears, and has commissioned a study to appraise the animal's value as a national icon. (Jonathan Hayward/Canadian Press)

When a German hunting enthusiast flies from Berlin to Iqaluit, Nunavut, Canada to get a polar bear in the sights of his rifle, the price tag will cost him $15,000.

A nature enthusiast who takes a trip from Seattle to Churchill, Man., for three days of tundra-buggy encounters will pay $5,200. Hunting expeditions, wildlife-watching tours — these are easy costs to calculate when gauging the price of polar bear.

But what are polar bears actually worth?

Canada is home to about 15,000 of the world's largest land carnivores. They roam around in Canada's collective backyard and in our imagination — but it's hard to put a price on their existence.

Environment Canada is going to try.

Earlier this month, the Canadian federal government department awarded a contract to EcoRessources Consultants to determine the total economic value of the polar bear.

The federal government wants to understand the impact of adding these majestic creatures to the list of wildlife species at risk.

Essentially, they are trying to figure out what it will cost if they protect polar bears.

"We're trying to put that value on what it means to the economy and what it means just to have a polar bear around," explains Mary Taylor, Director of Environment Canada's conservation service.

Wildlife value rarely gauged

These types of assessments are difficult, but not uncommon. There is a whole cohort of economists who specialize in them. What they try to do is quantify elements of the environment that have always just been taken for granted.

For example: An undisturbed tundra habitat or a river with protected marine wildlife. The goal is to assign a value to undeveloped ecosystems in order to compare their worth to potential industrial development, such as a mine or a fishery. It may sound naive and idealistic, but according to Vic Adamowicz, it is absolutely necessary.

"If we don't try to do these kinds of assessments, then often these species have implicitly a zero value placed on them," argues Adamowicz, a professor at the University of Alberta's Department of Rural Economy.

So, what's a polar bear worth now? What will it be worth if you can't hunt it anymore?

Paul Irngaut knows the answer to both of those questions.

"For us Inuit, the polar bear is invaluable — economically and socially," asserts the wildlife officer for Nunavut Tunngavik, Inc. (the territory's land claims manager).

End the polar bear hunt, and Irngaut predicts nuisance bears, an exploding population and the loss of much-needed jobs.

Irngaut believes there is something much bigger than just the protection of the polar bear behind this study.

"Why are they putting a value on polar bears? Is it because of climate change? If that's the case then say it. And take steps to deal with the climate change issue," he says.

In the meantime, Irngaut just hopes the Inuit will be consulted in this study.

EcoRessources must finish its report by the beginning of February 2011. Afterwards, Environment Minister will, eventually, make a determination about whether or not to add the polar bear to the species at risk list.