When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  Canada  Environment  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Imperial Oil and its partners want to build a 1,200-kilometre natural gas pipeline stretching from the Mackenzie River Delta to a hub in northern Alberta. (Rick Bowmer/Associated Press)
Imperial Oil and its partners want to build a 1,200-kilometre natural gas pipeline stretching from the Mackenzie River Delta to a hub in northern Alberta. (Rick Bowmer/Associated Press)
The National Energy Board has approved the long-proposed Mackenzie Valley pipeline, a big step forward for the $16.2-billion natural gas project.

In its written decision released Thursday, the federal energy regulator ruled that Imperial Oil and its partners' proposal to build the 1,200-kilometre pipeline through the Northwest Territories "is in the public interest."

The board's approval comes with a total of 264 required conditions to ensure the northern environment is protected, and to ensure pipeline safety.

Calgary-based Imperial is the lead company in the consortium that is spearheading the pipeline. The consortium also includes Exxon Mobil Corp., ConocoPhillips, Royal Dutch Shell PLC and the Aboriginal Pipeline Group.

6 years of review

The decision caps a six-year review process by the NEB, which held public hearings and analyzed data on the proposal since the pipeline consortium submitted its application in 2004.

Around that time, an independent joint review panel was created to consult northerners about the environmental and socio-economic impacts of the proposed pipeline.

The panel released its report Dec. 30, 2009, approving the project as long as its 176 recommendations were followed by the pipeline proponents and the federal and N.W.T. governments.

The panel's report was submitted to the NEB, which held its final round of hearings in April. In all, the energy board held 58 days of hearings in 15 communities across the Northwest Territories and northern Alberta.

Over the past six years, regulators heard passionate debates between pipeline supporters who believe a pipeline would pump jobs and money into the Northwest Territories, and critics who worry the project would open vast areas of the territory to environmental damage and social disruption.

Imperial must decide by 2013

With the NEB's approval in hand, it is now up to the federal cabinet to make a final decision on the planned project. It is also up to the consortium to decide by Dec. 31, 2013, whether it will actually go ahead with building the pipeline.

Imperial Oil had asked the NEB for three more years to decide, as it wanted to see how natural gas prices would recover as well as negotiate some kind of financial agreement with the federal government.

But the NEB turned down that request, saying northerners are anxious to see progress on the project and prepare.

The board kept the original deadline of 2013 for the consortium to submit its decision, as well as give an update on how much the project will cost. Actual construction must start by the end of 2015, according to the energy board.

The pipeline proponents will also have to secure land- and water-use permits, sign benefit and compensation agreements with First Nations along the pipeline route, and work out financial arrangements.

The National Energy Board's decision comes at a time when natural gas markets are recovering from the recession. While critics have pointed to emerging natural gas sources, such as shale gas and liquefied natural gas, the energy board said a northern pipeline should still be given a chance.

"Natural gas price trends remain uncertain. We do not agree with those who say these are reasons to deny the project," the board's decision says.

Northwest Territories Industry Minister Bob McLeod called the decision "an early Christmas present."

"This is an important milestone for a project that could provide significant economic and environmental benefits for the Northwest Territories and for Canada," he said.

Bob Reid, president of the Aboriginal Pipeline Group, hailed the decision, saying it's a "great day both for the North and for Canada as a whole."

"This is truly a nation-building project. It's going to be able to deliver the clean energy we need in an environmentally responsible way."

But Kevin O'Reilly of Alternatives North, a social justice coalition operating in the Northwest Territories, said he was disappointed that "they didn't pay more attention to sustainability."