When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  Canada  Environment  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
The Alfred Wegener Institute's icebreaker Polarstern is en route to Lancaster Sound, where Canadian and German scientists had planned to conduct seismic testing. (Alfred Wegener Institute)
The Alfred Wegener Institute's icebreaker Polarstern is en route to Lancaster Sound, where Canadian and German scientists had planned to conduct seismic testing. (Alfred Wegener Institute)
Prime Minister Stephen Harper has waded into the growing debate over a controversial Arctic seismic testing program in Lancaster Sound.

The debate over the program reached a new level on Sunday when the Nunavut Court of Justice issued an injunction temporarily halting Natural Resources Canada's geomapping project in the sound, located at the eastern entrance to the Northwest Passage.

Inuit in five communities in the area — Resolute Bay, Arctic Bay, Grise Fiord, Clyde River and Pond Inlet — have largely opposed the project, arguing the sound blasts used to map the seabed would disrupt the migration patterns of whales, polar bears and other wildlife that they have relied on for generations.

Inuit and environmental groups have also raised concerns that geomapping could lead to oil and gas exploration in an area that Ottawa is thinking of designating as a national marine conservation area.

For scientific purposes only: Harper

"The work being done there is not for oil and gas exploration," Harper told reporters in Vancouver.

"The work being done there is general scientific mapping work that the federal government has been sponsoring across the Arctic region to better scientifically understand the region and obviously create scientific opportunities."

The project is a collaboration between the Geological Survey of Canada, which is part of Natural Resources Canada, and the Alfred Wegener Institute of Germany.

The German institute's ship Polarstern has been sailing toward Lancaster Sound, off the north coast of Baffin Island, with permits to conduct seismic tests on the sea floor.

Potential for 'irreparable harm'

The Qikiqtani Inuit Association, which represents Inuit in the five affected communities, sought the injunction, arguing that Inuit had not been meaningfully consulted about the project.

In her written decision, Judge Sue Cooper noted that a consultant's report — which the federal and Nunavut governments cited to back their claims that seismic tests would have little or no impact of marine mammals — came with protocols to mitigate the impact of seismic activity on wildlife.

Those protocols support "the conclusion that there are impacts," wrote Cooper, who concluded that "Inuit in the five affected communities will suffer irreparable harm if an injunction is not granted."

Arctic Bay resident Moses Uyukuluk, who attended Natural Resources Canada's consultation meeting in his community, said he's thankful the Qikiqtani Inuit Association defended people's rights in court.

Speaking in Inuktitut, Uyukuluk told CBC News the federal scientists' proposal to have Inuit observers aboard the research ship would be "a useless thing, because the actual testing will be done deep in the water and people won't be able to see what is down there and what is being affected."

"Inuit are dependent on marine mammals for food, so it seems it was a useless gesture," Uyukuluk said. "I don't want them to proceed whatsoever."

Authorities not commenting

Officials with the Nunavut government and the Nunavut Impact Review Board, both of which gave their approvals to the project, told CBC News they are reserving comment while they study Cooper's decision.

Natural Resources Canada says it is committed to geomapping projects across the North. The department withheld further comment, saying the project is subject to continuing legal proceedings.

Lawyers for the Inuit association said the federal government has a number of options, from cancelling the project altogether to holding meaningful consultations with affected Inuit. They could also appeal Cooper's injunction, the organization added.

Comments  

 
#1 Harper's visit to Lancaster SoundStan Squires 2010-08-24 13:02
I am from Vancouver and i wanted to say that the Canadian government never did anything for the Inuit People of Northern Canada that was of any value to the people. People living there have been living in third world conditions for ages. There is a great need for better housing and electricity as well as a better distribution of goods coming from the south and at a cheaper cost to the people there. This should have been done years ago. There is no excuse for the way things are in the Inuit communities of northern Canada.The full blame lies with the Canadian gov. This is an apartheid policy by the Canadian gov. against the Inuit People of Northern Canada
Quote