When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  Canada  Environment  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

A plan for mining exploration in Tombstone Territorial Park, N.W.T., has drawn hundreds of submissions opposing the proposal.
A plan for mining exploration in Tombstone Territorial Park, N.W.T., has drawn hundreds of submissions opposing the proposal.

Hundreds of people from across Canada are objecting to a proposal which would allow mining exploration in Tombstone Territorial Park in the Yukon.

Canadian United Minerals, which staked claims in the area before it became a park, wants to do some exploration and drilling on the claims.

The Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board, which is collecting public input on the proposal, has received more than 500 comments in the last three days, most of them expressing concerns about the proposed development.

The comments came flooding in after the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, a charity that advocates for public wilderness protection, asked members to let the assessment board know their opinions about the proposal.

The society also sent out a call for help on a Yukon email newsgroup.

Many of the submissions echo concerns raised by the wilderness society in its communications.

A June 7 letter from the Tr'ondek Hwech'in, Na-Cho Nyak Dun and Gwich'in Tribal Council also opposes the proposal.

The letter says the area has great historical significance for aboriginal people. It expresses concern about the amount of disturbance that would be caused by trail building, and expresses doubts about the effectiveness of rehabilitation plans.

"We respectfully ask you to recommend that the Canadian United Minerals proposal be rejected," the letter from Tr'ondek Hwech'in Chief Eddie Taylor, Na-Cho Nyak Dun Chief Simon Mervyn and Gwich'in Tribal Council president Richard Nerysoo says.

"We have inherent constitutional rights to continue to rely upon the resources within Tombstone Territorial Park for our sustenance and well being," the letter concludes. "Our rights take precedence over the interests of the miner."

The Yukon Conservation Society has also asked that the proposal be rejected.

The assessment board will consider public input in its recommendations, but the final decision rests with the Yukon government.

The proposal is to do five years of quartz exploration on 18 claims in the park, according to assessment board documents. The company plans to get to the sites via helicopter and, during winter months, on snowmobiles and snow cats.

Heavy machinery will drill about 20 trenches of 100 cubic metres each, 20 diamond holes, and an underground structure that will displace about 120 cubic metres of material.

Explosives use will be limited to 350 kilograms in 30 days. About 300 cubic metres of water will be used daily, and some new trails will be added to existing trails.

An existing camp will be reactivated to accommodate eight people, and reclamation activities will take place to restore the area at the end of five years, the assessment board information says.