When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  Canada  Environment  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Boats sit idle in the port of Cordova, Alaska, where the effects of the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill still run deep. (Greg Rasmussen/CBC)
Boats sit idle in the port of Cordova, Alaska, where the effects of the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill still run deep. (Greg Rasmussen/CBC)
People in a small Alaskan fishing town are watching the Gulf of Mexico oil spill closely, worried their counterparts there might suffer the way they did in the 1989 Exxon Valdez crisis.

Cordova, at the head of the Orca Inlet in Prince William Sound, was hit hard when the Exxon Valdez oil tanker crashed into a reef just minutes after midnight on March 24, unleashing what was then the biggest oil spill in U.S. history.

Oil fouled the coastline, transforming the town virtually overnight.

Memories of those times have been flooding back since April 20, when a BP-leased oil rig exploded off the Louisiana coast and caused a deepwater well to leak as much as 20,000 to 40,000 barrels a day before it was partially contained with a cap on June 3.

"It brings it all back, the difficulty we had to deal with, and it scares me, because it's so bad down there," Osa Schultz told the CBC's Greg Rasmussen, who visited Cordova earlier this week.

"I mean, it was bad for us," Schultz said, pulling the cover off the gillnet as her boat, Prime Time, motored out into the ocean. "But it's worse down there, so it's going to be a nightmare."

Osa Schultz, whose fishing and bed-and-breakfast businesses were ruined by the Exxon Valdez spill in 1989, sits aboard her ship, Prime Time, in Cordova, Alaska. (Greg Rasmussen/CBC)
Osa Schultz, whose fishing and bed-and-breakfast businesses were ruined by the Exxon Valdez spill in 1989, sits aboard her ship, Prime Time, in Cordova, Alaska. (Greg Rasmussen/CBC)
Twenty-one years later, much of the oil is gone from the beaches, though some still lies just below the sand's surface.

Livelihoods, however, remain in shambles, say fishermen like Bob Martinson.

"You lose everything, and there's nothing you can do about it," Martinson told Rasmussen.

Exxon had promised Martinson and thousands more of his fellow fishermen, and their suppliers, that they would be compensated for their losses, he said.

But despite a 15-year legal fight, Schultz said she and her husband received compensation worth only about 10 per cent of the money they lost on their fishing and bed-and-breakfast businesses, among others.

Martinson said he received just a few pennies on the dollar, and fears fishermen in the Gulf of Mexico will suffer the same treatment by BP.

"They're going to hope, and pray, and work on it and work on it," Martinson said, "but those fishermen and businesses just aren't going to get anything in the long run."

Lessons applied in Louisiana

Cordova has become a vast scientific and social case study on how to deal with a catastrophic oil spill.

"How you go about assessing the oiling conditions ... [was] learned here," said Duncan Fitzgerald, a professor of coastal marine geology at Boston University who has studied the Cordova region for 20 years. "I'm now applying those in Louisiana."

'You lose everything, and there's nothing you can do about it,' says Cordova fisherman Bob Martinson. (Greg Rasmussen/CBC)
'You lose everything, and there's nothing you can do about it,' says Cordova fisherman Bob Martinson. (Greg Rasmussen/CBC)
The situation in Cordova "is enabling us now to go down to the Gulf Coast and say, 'Here's what you can expect, here are the community impacts of this, and here are the long-term cumulative impacts you expect,'" said sociologist Liesel Ritchie of the University of Colorado at Boulder.

U.S. President Barack Obama hosted what he called "a frank conversation" with congressional leaders about adequate compensation for suffering Gulf businesses at the White House on Thursday.

"It's going to be important that ... we update the laws to make sure that the people in the Gulf — the fishermen, the hotel owners, families — who are dependent for their livelihoods on the Gulf, that they are all made whole and that we are in a much better position to respond to any such crisis in the future," he said after the meeting.