When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  Canada  Environment  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

The N.W.T. government's ban on hunting in the Bathurst caribou herd's winter range began on Jan. 1. Dene leaders questioned the legitimacy of the ban, arguing that it infringes on aboriginal hunting rights. (CBC)
The N.W.T. government's ban on hunting in the Bathurst caribou herd's winter range began on Jan. 1. Dene leaders questioned the legitimacy of the ban, arguing that it infringes on aboriginal hunting rights. (CBC)
Canada's Northwest Territories provincial government has withdrawn its request to get a court opinion on whether its authority to regulate caribou hunting trumps the hunting rights of aboriginal groups.

The N.W.T. Supreme Court was asked in February to clarify whether the territorial government has the authority to ban aboriginal subsistence hunting in the Bathurst caribou herd's winter range, which extends north of Great Slave Lake to the N.W.T.-Nunavut border.

The court was also asked to confirm whether the government's authority to regulate caribou hunting supersedes the hunting rights of Dene and other aboriginal groups.

The decision to ask the court to clarify the issue came after Dene leaders — and even some MLAs — questioned the legality of the hunting ban, which has been in place since Jan. 1.

'Let's decide this for ourselves': premier

But on Wednesday, the government announced it is withdrawing the case because some aboriginal leaders have said it would be "unnecessarily divisive."

Premier Floyd Roland said the territory's political leaders will instead work out the issue of when and how of hunting bans will be imposed.

"The courts are always there and will be there and can be used from time to time," Roland told CBC News on Wednesday.

"But here, it will be a test for the regional leaders' meeting, I guess, to see if the regional leaders can come together.... Let's decide this for ourselves."

The Dene's national chief, Bill Erasmus, agreed that it's better to negotiate a solution than it is to seek one through the courts.

"That's why we're at the table. We've been at the table for a long time," Erasmus said.

"Part of it is to develop a place in the North that we're all comfortable with, something that makes sense to all of us, and the only way you can do that is by talking it out."

Some groups disappointed

Some aboriginal groups that have been affected by the hunting ban say they are unhappy that the court case is being withdrawn.

Lawyers for the Yellowknives Dene First Nation said the N.W.T. government is simply trying to avoid having to prove that it has met the strict conditions required to interfere with aboriginal hunting rights.

The North Slave Métis Alliance had also wanted the government's case to proceed since it cannot afford to pursue the issue in court on its own.

"We would have liked to hear an answer from the court on this question, on somebody else's tab," said Sheryl Grieve, the alliance's environment director.

"We certainly don't have the expertise — or the money to get the expertise — to get an answer on our own."

Grieve said the North Slave Métis were never consulted about the caribou hunting ban, though their hunting rights are also constitutionally protected.

But Erasmus said the government's court case would not have dealt with all the issues aboriginal leaders had about the hunting ban.

"When we heard they were going to put a question forward, we were prepared to talk to them about what the question ought to be so that it, in fact, addressed the concerns that everyone has," Erasmus said.

"That didn't happen; they drafted it themselves. So, we didn't think that it really would have answered all of the questions that are before us."

Roland said returning discussions about the caribou hunting ban to the political realm will be a test of how effectively regional leaders can work together.

The caribou hunting ban will continue to be enforced in the meantime, Roland said.