When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  Canada  Environment  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Gulf_of_Mexico_Oil_Slick_NASA_Picture_April_25_2010
NASA's Aqua satellite captured this image of the Gulf of Mexico on April 25, 2010 using its Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instrument. With the Mississippi Delta on the left, the silvery swirling oil slick from the April 20 explosion and subsequent sinking of the Deepwater Horizon drilling platform is highly visible. The rig was located roughly 50 miles (80km) southeast of the coast of Louisiana. Courtesy of NASA
The oil well explosion in the Gulf of Mexico has raised questions about the safety of drilling for oil and gas in the Beaufort Sea.

Oil companies like BP, ExxonMobil, Chevron and Imperial Oil have invested hundreds of millions of dollars to lease large tracts of the Beaufort seabed for exploration.

But Western Arctic Member of Parliament (MP) Dennis Bevington says the explosion of BP's sub-sea well off Louisiana on April 20 — and the resulting oil spill — should raise warning flags in Canada, especially about the need for relief wells in Arctic drilling operations.

"These same oil companies want an exemption from having to drill relief wells for their operations in the Beaufort Sea," Bevington, a member of the left-of-centre New Democratic Party, said during question period in Canada's federal parliament Friday.

"With this clear evidence that the most stringent environmental protections must be applied to offshore drilling, will this government stand up to the oil companies, enforce drilling relief wells and come up with a real plan to deal with disasters in our Arctic waters?"

Relief well policy under review

Environment Minister Jim Prentice said the National Energy Board, a federal independent agency that regulates parts of Canada's energy sector, is reviewing its policies on relief wells.

"We have amongst the most robust offshore drilling policies anywhere in the world that applies in Canadian waters," Prentice said, adding that no exploratory wells are authorized in the outer Beaufort Sea now.

"The National Energy Board is, in any event, reviewing its relief well policy. They obviously will be attentive to how this develops."

Oil and gas companies that want to drill in the Arctic must first get regulatory approvals from the National Energy Board. To do that, they must show they will drill relief wells in case of an accident or provide an alternative safety plan.

Oil companies have argued relief wells in the North are not practical, since it would take too long to drill them if there is an accident.

Blowout prevention studied

The National Energy Board is looking at other ways to prevent oil well blowouts.

Like all oil rigs, the BP rig in the Gulf of Mexico was equipped with a "blowout preventer," a house-sized metal device that is supposed to squish the affected oil pipe and seal it shut. In the Gulf of Mexico case, the device did not work.

Some Canadian oil and gas companies, including Chevron, say they are developing similar but newer technology that would control an Arctic well before it got out of control and blew out.

"There are technological solutions out there that can be brought to bear to make drilling safe enough," said Bill Scott, manager of Chevron's Arctic Centre in Calgary.

Scott said Chevron has developed a blowout preventer that has more safety features. The company is testing its new device in a laboratory and plans to submit it to the National Energy Board for approval this fall.

Danish drilling a concern for MP

Bevington also asked Prentice about Denmark's recent move to issue drilling permits in the eastern Arctic waterway of Davis Strait.

Bevington argued that Denmark's permits would allow companies to drill right up against Canada's maritime border with Greenland, raising the risks of an accident affecting Canadian Arctic waters.

"Davis Strait is also known as 'Iceberg Alley,' and all we have protecting us is a non-binding agreement on oil pollution," he said.

"What is this government doing to ensure Denmark is taking all the steps necessary to protect the environment in the strait? Or are we going to wait until oil is washing up on the shores of Nunavut?"

Prentice did not offer any specific details but said the environment will be protected.

"The government of Canada has an excellent relationship with the recently elected home-rule government in Greenland," he said. "In fact, the Canadian government has signed the very first agreement with that new government in Greenland, which was to protect the polar bears.

"We've discussed these very issues with this government, and Canadians can be assured that the environment will be protected."