When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  Canada  Environment  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Crews clean up oil that leaked from Enbridge's Norman Wells pipeline south of Wrigley, N.W.T., in early May. Upwards of 1,500 barrels of oil have spilled from the pipeline, according to the company. Photo submitted by D'Arcy J. Moses.
Crews clean up oil that leaked from Enbridge's Norman Wells pipeline south of Wrigley, N.W.T., in early May. Upwards of 1,500 barrels of oil have spilled from the pipeline, according to the company. Photo submitted by D'Arcy J. Moses.
People in Wrigley, Northwest Territories voiced their anger and frustration with Enbridge on Thursday for the way the company handled an oil pipeline leak near their community.

About 40 residents in Wrigley, a Dene community of about 100, joined Pehdzeh Ki First Nation Chief Tim Lennie and councillors as they met with Enbridge officials to discuss the pipeline leak and cleanup efforts.

Local hunters discovered the leak at Enbridge's Norman Wells pipeline south of Wrigley around May 9, in a forested area near the Willowlake River.

Around the time the spill was reported, Enbridge said only four barrels of oil had leaked into the soil.

The company later revised its estimate, saying upwards of 1,500 barrels have spilled. Crews have been cleaning up the contaminated areas since May.

Youth and elders were among those who attended Thursday's meeting with Enbridge at the Wrigley band office, the CBC's Allison Devereaux reported from the community.

Remediation efforts on hold

An Enbridge representative told residents on Thursday that the oil spill is fully contained, maintaining that none of the oil has leaked into the Willowlake River.

But the official added that Enbridge has not found a place to store the contaminated soil, which it plans to ship to Zama, Alta. As a result, remediation efforts are caught in a holding pattern, residents were told.

Company officials would not say whether or not the spilled oil may migrate, but said it is a possibility because of melting permafrost.

Lennie said at the meeting that he wants to repair the relationship Wrigley has with Enbridge, but not before expressing his frustration with the company for how it has handled the pipeline spill.

Lennie refused Enbridge's offer of $5,000 to help his First Nation hire experts to analyze the company's 674-page draft cleanup plan.

'Callous and insulting' treatment

The chief said the money being offered is not enough to help the First Nation adequately understand Enbridge's technical plan before it is submitted to the National Energy Board.

Lennie also criticized the company for bringing in cleanup workers without offering jobs to local people first.

Brad Enge described Enbridge's treatment of people in Wrigley as "callous and insulting."

Enbridge officials told residents they did not intend to alienate the community.

Since the spill came to light, residents in Wrigley have raised concerns about its potential impacts on human health, as well as the health of area wildlife that people hunt for food.

The company promised to provide a health expert who can answer residents' questions at the First Nation's annual assembly at the end of this month.

Originally posted August 11, 2011