When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  Canada  Environment  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Located just outside Yellowknife, Giant Mine produced more than seven million ounces of gold from 1948 until 1999. The federal government is responsible for cleaning up contamination at the mine site. Image CBC.
Located just outside Yellowknife, Giant Mine produced more than seven million ounces of gold from 1948 until 1999. The federal government is responsible for cleaning up contamination at the mine site. Image CBC.
Federal officials in Yellowknife, the capital of Canada's Northwest Territories, are worried that a growing sinkhole at the former Giant Mine could result in water seeping into the site's underground arsenic chambers.

The sinkhole first appeared in May and is currently six square metres in size. It's located between Baker Creek and an open pit connected to the underground section of the mine.

The depression is close to four underground chambers in which thousands of tonnes of arsenic trioxide — a toxic byproduct of gold production — are being stored.

Officials with the federal Department of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development are concerned the sinkhole could make it easier for water from Baker Creek to seep into the arsenic chambers, should the creek flood again next spring.

"Water entering your mine uncontrolled is bad in any situation. We have to then treat that water so then there's a cost associated with it," Adrian Paradis, the acting project manager with the Giant Mine remediation team, told CBC News on Thursday.

"Having water near the arsenic chambers is something that we try to avoid," he added. " But it is a risk that it could eventually escape [in the] worst-case scenario."

In addition to being toxic, arsenic trioxide is highly soluble in water. As part of their cleanup at the mine site, government officials plan to freeze 273,000 tonnes of arsenic trioxide that are being stored in underground vaults.

The federal department has filed a letter with the Mackenzie Impact Review Board this week, notifying the environmental regulator that "new activities may be required on site this year to ensure arsenic containment."

Paradis said a plan to deal with the sinkhole should be in place by the fall. In the meantime, officials are conducting tests to ensure no water has already entered the mine site via the sinkhole, he said.

Creek winds through mine site

Giant Mine produced more than seven million ounces of gold from 1948 until it closed in 1999.

Baker Creek winds through the contaminated mine property, which is currently being cleaned up by the federal government.

In mid-May, the creek flooded its banks and spilled into one of the mine site's waste tailings ponds and carried the contaminated water back into the creek, which flows into Great Slave Lake a few kilometres away.

The tailings areas at the Giant Mine site typically contain arsenic and other chemical byproducts of gold mining.

As a result of the flooding, arsenic levels in the creek jumped to more than 1,400 times the standard for protecting aquatic life, and 700 times the level recommended for drinking water.

Federal officials said at the time that almost none of the arsenic contained in the tailings dissolved in the water, so it could not be absorbed by fish.

At the same time, officials said the water in the creek will never be safe for drinking or swimming.

But Paradis warned that the damage from an overflow could be even worse if water seeps into the mine.

"It could overwhelm our stations and we would not be able to keep up with pumping and treating the water," he said.

"Worst-case scenario is maximum probable floods," he added. "we could potentially flood the mine out in three to four days."