When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.
Canada

Featured Videos

Our Bloggers

Related Items

Latest Blog Posts

Latest Images

Arctic
Shooting Range
Setting up Camp
The Saami of Russia
Ice and rock
Clyde River hunters compare notes.

Feeds from Canada

Feeds from USA

Home  News  Canada  Geopolitics  
Geopolitics

Seismic Tests Could Benefit Community: Nunavut, Canada

Print Wednesday, 09 June 2010 06:45 Written by CBC News



AddThis Social Bookmark Button
CANADA - Nunavut Environment Minister Daniel Shewchuk says much could be gained from a federal proposal to conduct seismic tests for potential oil and gas resources in Lancaster Sound and other Arctic waterways.

But Shewchuk stressed that knowing of potential resources would not necessarily lead to future drilling.

He also said data from the proposed seismic tests could even help Ottawa determine if a national marine conservation area should be created in Lancaster Sound.

Speaking in the territorial legislature Monday, Shewchuk said it would be good to know what's in an area before planning anything.

"I think that we wouldn't be prudent ... if [we], as the government of Nunavut, didn't know what the economic benefits to that area could be to, in fact, assist the community, the residents that live in that area," Shewchuk said.

The project by Natural Research Canada, which federal scientists hope to start this summer, would be an attempt to map out underwater geographical features. Beginning in August, a research vessel would send sound waves though several Arctic waterways, including Lancaster Sound.

"This is a basic research project. The Government of Canada does not drill for oil and gas," Donald James, the chief geologist with the federal Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office, told CBC News.

"The only way to find oil and gas is to drill, and this project is not about drilling, it's about making a new generation ... geological map."

Potential conservation area

Lancaster Sound, located at the eastern entrance to the Northwest Passage, is also where the federal government is thinking of creating a national marine conservation area, since it is a habitat for narwhal, beluga and bowhead whales, as well as seabirds, seals, walrus and polar bears.

Parks Canada, the Nunavut government and the Qikiqtani Inuit Association are working on a feasibility study to determine whether Lancaster Sound should be designated as a conservation area.

Shewchuk has faced pressure from opponents of the seismic tests since the Nunavut Impact Review Board recommended last month that the project proceed without a detailed review, meaning it can be granted a research licence.

As the minister responsible for the Nunavut Research Institute, Shewchuk must decide whether to issue that licence or send the project back to the board for review.

Shewchuk said he will make a decision after he hears back about consultations that Natural Resources Canada has conducted in High Arctic communities. Federal officials have already visited Arctic Bay, Resolute and Pond Inlet to get public feedback on the project.

Arctic Bay Mayor Niore Iqalukjuaq said many residents in his community oppose the idea of seismic testing in their region, fearing possible impacts on wildlife and the environment.

"They plan on doing this at a time when a lot of marine mammals have migrated north," Iqalukjuaq told CBC News on Tuesday.

James, a federal geologist, said seismic testing has taken place in parts of the Arctic for about 20 years, and it has not been proven that such work has affected marine animals in a harmful way.

Past exploration damaging: Inuit official

The Qikiqtani Inuit Association also opposes the seismic test proposal, arguing that oil and gas companies would likely waste no time in exploring any areas the seismic may identify as having oil and gas resources.

"We all remember back in the '60s and the '70s [when] the Government of Canada opened the High Arctic for oil and gas exploration, and the oil companies just went crazy. They did a lot of damage in the High Arctic islands," said John Amagoalik, the Inuit association's director of lands and planning.

"The biggest blowout in North America happened in the High Arctic, in the 1960s on Melville Island," he added. "There was [a] blowout and it was not stopped for three months. It kept gushing for three months."

Amagoalik said Inuit do not want such a disaster to be repeated. He said Shewchuk should not approve the seismic testing project until more information is gathered.

Drilling concerns premature: minister

Amagoalik's concerns were echoed on Monday by Quttiktuq MLA Ron Elliott, whose constituency covers High Arctic communities. Elliott grilled Shewchuk on Monday about how the seismic data would be used.

"It sounds like if the economic opportunities outweigh the environmental opportunities in terms of preserving the wildlife there, we're going to end up with oil and gas exporation in our area," Elliott said in the legislature.

Shewchuk did not deny oil and gas exploration as a possibility, but he dismissed Elliott's concerns as premature.

Any projects that may result from the seismic testing data would require a lot of further consultation from affected communities, Shewchuk added.

"I think that because you know something and you know the potential that is there, and what you have as an inventory, doesn't mean that you are going to move in that direction," he said.

"The communities would be very very actively and heavily involved in that, and I think we're a long ways from that point."

Comments  

 
#1 Inuk scientist — Aupak 2010-12-15 12:14
Climate change, lithospheric composition, and the coastal communities should be considered with this, as Hydrocarbons will kill any living thing when it escapes the underground. The isostatic rebound of Hudson Bay should also be considered when all the globes sea levels are rising, with the exception of Hudson Bay, it is getting shallower, and I think this is a very dangerous sign, that the Hudson Strait and the deep part of Hudson Bay is the result of a rift of the crust, that was created about 4-6000 years ago E.T. impact of Iles De La Madeleine, which also created the "Little Ice Age". On an interesting note, Hudson Bay was also a result of an impact 23,000 years ago, which also prompted the volcanic eruptions when the crust was settling after the fact of an impact.
Quote