When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Featured Videos

Latest Images

Home  News  Canada  Geopolitics  


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

A road marker to help navigate vehicles blows in Nunavut. Canada begins its two-year term as head of the Arctic Council in April 2013. (Nathan Denette/Canadian Press)
A road marker to help navigate vehicles blows in Nunavut. Canada begins its two-year term as head of the Arctic Council in April 2013. (Nathan Denette/Canadian Press)
Council brings together northern aboriginals and eight nations that ring the North Pole

Canada gets its chance to lead the Arctic world next year — and analysts say the country needs to start laying the groundwork for it now.

"Canada can play a leadership role in a way that not only advances the public interest in Canada but also Canada's standing in the world," said former Yukon premier Tony Penikett.

He is leading a major conference in Toronto this week on what the country should aim for when it begins its two-year term as head of the Arctic Council in April 2013.

The Arctic Council brings together northern aboriginals and the eight nations that ring the North Pole. Once largely confined to research and advice, the council is increasingly important and passed its first binding treaty last year on Arctic search and rescue.

Further agreements, including one on developing energy resources, are under discussion."The Arctic Council is at a defining moment," said Sarah French, co-ordinator of the Munk-Gordon Arctic Security Program, which is sponsoring the conference.

"We've had some good successes, but where are we going next?

"It's an extremely interesting time and that's why it's so vital that Canada seizes the opportunity to really use its chairmanship to show that Canada is a strong Arctic player."

One of Canada's first tasks will be to figure out how to work with non-Arctic actors asking for a window into the council's discussions.

Last spring, the council agreed to consider criteria for granting observer status to states and organizations such as China and the European Union. Canada opposed their inclusion, but other member states said letting in the rest of the world will ensure the council remains the place where Arctic issues are resolved.

"We feel that some of the important issues like climate change have implications for other countries too," said Norwegian Ambassador Else Bert Eikeland, who will speak at the conference. "If they have a strong interest in the Arctic, if they can contribute to discussion, and if they respect the sovereignty of the Arctic nations, we think they could be of service."

Penikett said observer countries could be asked to pay dues that would fund aboriginal groups who already participate.

Pressure to include military issues

Canada is also likely to come under pressure to try to broaden the council's mandate to include security issues — pressure Canada should resist, said University of Waterloo academic Whitney Lackenbauer.

He said military issues would spoil the collegial, consensual atmosphere that has made the council successful.

"You're going to end up having power politics instead, forcing everybody to do the song and dance associated with traditional diplomacy," he said. "As soon as you usher in military security, the whole dynamic around the table is going to change."

Franklyn Griffiths, a University of Toronto political scientist and conference speaker, said Canada needs to start working on its agenda now.

The government "surely understands that it's much better to hit the ground running rather than to show up a year from now and start asking people what to do."

Griffiths said there's no sign the Harper Conservatives have appointed a "sherpa" — someone in charge of setting goals and travelling to Arctic capitals to get other countries on board.

"You've got to pre-negotiate that stuff," he said.

"Who will piece together a Canadian vision or strategy for its two-year chairmanship of the Arctic Council? Who will put together the Canadian agenda?"

U.S. next in line

Griffiths points out that the U.S. takes over the council from Canada, so there's an opportunity for North America to set the agenda for four years.

"We should be working directly with the U.S."

Chairmanship of the council rotates through all member countries, and Canada's next turn marks the end of the first complete rotation since the council was founded in Ottawa in 1996. It's one sign the council is coming of age as a vital international forum, said Lackenbauer.

"All eyes have turned to the Arctic. People have identified this as being the regional organization. Given that the (council) was a Canadian initiative, this is something that we can latch on to."