When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Latest Images

Home  Blog  Mia Bennett  


Mia Bennett
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Photo: Eilís Quinn, Radio Canada International.
Photo: Eilís Quinn, Radio Canada International.
Countries, non-profit organizations, indigenous peoples, and natural resource companies are all interested in obtaining a part of the Arctic.

Now, we can add a hedge fund to the list. Guggenheim Partners, the financial services company which manages over $125 billion in assets, has confirmed that it is looking into establishing an investment fund in the Arctic, perhaps with a focus on Alaska.

Alice Rogoff, publisher of the online newspaper Alaska Dispatch and wife of the co-founder of the Carlyle Group, David Rubenstein, first announced the news at the World Affairs Council's "Politics of Global Climate Change" conference at University of Alaska Southeast in Juneau earlier last week.

Rogoff also suggested that one investment possibility for Guggenheim would be to privately fund the construction of an icebreaker, which it could then lease out to the U.S. Coast Guard. However, Lawson Brigham, a professor and retired Coast Guard captain, observed that this would likely not be practical, given that the Coast Guard would need full and unrestricted access to a federally-funded ship during war, should it ever break out in the Arctic.

Rogoff added, "The single biggest source of investment dollars in Guggenheim's or probably anybody's fund will be China." This would be an indirect way for China to invest in and potentially profit from the Arctic even though it does not have any territory there. This would not be the first instance of private Chinese investment in the Arctic: Businessman Huang Nubo is planning to buy a swath of land equal to one percent of Iceland to turn into an ecoresort.

Plan in early stages

Guggenheim spokesman Jeffrey Kelley remarked, "We are in the very early planning stages for an Arctic investment fund. At this point in time it would be premature to comment further about potential structure or investment parameters." Guggenheim reportedly posted a link to the article in Alaska Dispatch about the fund, but they seem to have removed it from their website, as I am unable to locate it.

However, a speech given by Guggenheim's CEO and CIO, Scott Minerd, in June 2011 at the Arctic Imperative Summit in Girdwood, Alaska might shed some light on the hedge fund's interests in the region. Minerd started his speech by giving an overview of the history of mercantilism.

Some countries, such as the U.S. and Canada, got their start by trading their natural resources. They were then were able to develop other industries that did not depend on finite resources, allowing them to advance their economies beyond the mercantilist stage. Others, however, "mistook the proceeds received from the sale of their natural resources as revenues, when in reality they should have been accounted for as the proceeds received in exchange for the disposition of assets," in the words of Minerd.

They have relied on oil, gas, coal, or other resources which are decreasing overtime. Alaska, which is heavily dependent on natural resource extraction, therefore "stands at a crossroads," along with the rest of the Arctic.

Minerd compares Alaska to an emerging market. He claims, "Alaska today could be referred to as America's crown jewel. Within our lifetime, Alaska has the potential to become the most dynamic growth engine among all the states of the Union." This would be a huge turnaround, since Alaska is currently the number one recipient of federal stimulus aid per capita – by far. One researcher, David Barker at the University of Iowa, has also determined that it has cost the federal government more money to develop Alaska than it has received.

Minerd closes his speech by giving the state advice on how to locate good investors. Minerd emphasizes that the ideal capital partner will shares their talents and their money with Alaska. The state's residents need to learn the "human capital skills" from hedge funds in order to be able to properly manage the state's assets going forward. Minerd concludes, "Their money will help, but their human capital skills are the real resources that are to be traded for the rich natural resources of Alaska." Whether the ideal capital partner will be Guggenheim has yet to be seen.

News Links

"Guggenheim confirms interest in Arctic fund," Juneau Empire

"Guggenheim partners announces Arctic investment fund," The Guardian