When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don't always think alike - and that's precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it's important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca's online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca's online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in seven languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden.
  10. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  11. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  12. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  13. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  14. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International forums is prohibited.
  15. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  16. Radio Canada International reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  17. Radio Canada International reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  18. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  19. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.
Home  Blog  Heather Exner-Pirot  
Heather Exner-Pirot

The gap between North and South

Print Wednesday, 05 October 2011 23:04 Written by Heather Exner-Pirot



Heather Exner-Pirot
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Some northerners have argued that their communities should have the same level of government services as southerners – no more and no less.  But of course that is impossible.   Northern Canadians will never have the same level of services as southern Canadians, not because they are northern, or aboriginal, but because they are rural.  A gap exists around the world in the level of development between those who live in urban areas and those who live in rural areas, and it is unlikely to get smaller.  That is why migration is almost exclusively in the direction of rural to urban no matter what country you live in.

Yet we continue to compare the quality of life and standard of living between North and South as though the objective is to make them the same.  I am as guilty as anyone.   I frequently trot out figures about the poverty of the North, particularly in regions with high aboriginal populations, to underscore the urgency and need for improvement in the social and economic development of the North.  Similarly, the Conference Board of Canada has done an excellent job of parsing out Census statistics to highlight the poverty; crime, lack of educational attainment, housing, and lower life expectancies.  It is compelling stuff.  But how fair is the comparison – both to governments and communities? 

Delivering services in the North

First the governments: how can we expect them (local, provincial/territorial, federal) to provide an equal level of services and a comparable level of development to all Canadians when conditions across the country are so different?  The North, in particular, is a difficult place to provide all the trappings of the welfare state.  A lack of infrastructure makes it expensive to provide fresh food, gas and heat at prices that are comparable to those in the south. A lack of skilled labour - nurses, doctors, physiotherapists, pharmacists - makes it difficult to provide medical services in the North on par with that found in cities.  Recreational activities and facilities are fewer and further between.  Basic municipal services – waste management, protective services, public transportation - suffer from a lack of an economy of scale where they exist at all.   And as we’re seeing in the context of the global recession, governments can raise and lower interests rates, provide tax breaks, and invest in infrastructure; but try as they might they can’t reliably make jobs.  As long as high unemployment exists in some northern communities, there will be issues of poverty, alcoholism, anomie and domestic abuse. 

Measuring well-being

If it’s unfair to blame governments for the comparatively low level of services in the North, it is also unfair to blame northern communities for not achieving southern levels of development.  Well-being can be measured in terms of income, life expectancy and literacy (the staples of the UN’s Human Development Index), but it can also be measured in terms of attachment to the land, family and community.  It can be measured in terms of cultural retention.  And it can be measured in terms of happiness.  A number of projects have attempted to develop such alternative measures of well-being.  One of them, the Survey of Living Conditions in the Arctic (SLiCA), provides a measurement of well-being based on indicators that northerners view as the most important to them.  The conclusion is not that life in the North is without its problems; turns out a decent income, literacy and a high life expectancy is a pretty good thing for anybody.   But it does provide a framework to compare well-being between regions that have similar lifestyles and values, in order to gauge how they stack up against other northern, rather than southern, communities.   

Looking ahead

What everyone will agree on is that northerners need better services than what they have access to now.  There is always a better way to a better way and we all have a responsibility to look for it.  But northern communities are not likely to ever achieve the same level of development as in the South, and those who want to have access to the kinds of services available in Edmonton or Ottawa or Montreal should move there.  Some have.  Many others have chosen the lifestyle that is only available in the North and the different kind of well-being that it offers.  Not more and not less – just different.